Lucy v. Zehmer: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Case Brief
{{Infobox Case Brief
|court=Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia
|court=Virginia Supreme Court
|citation=196 Va. 493 (1954)
|citation=196 Va. 493 (1954)
|date=1954
|date=November 22, 1954
|subject=Contracts
|subject=Contracts
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Zehmer owned a large farm in Virginia that Lucy wanted to buy, and he had tried to buy for several years.
One night when Zehmer was drunk, Lucy and he were arguing about if Lucy could afford to buy the farm for $50,000. Lucy said, "I bet you wouldn't take $50,000 for that place." Zehmer responded, "Yes I would too; you wouldn't give fifty." An agreement was made and written up on the spot that the farm would be sold to Lucy for $50,000. Zehmer and his wife signed it along with Lucy.
|issues=Is the agreement an enforceable contract, even if one party did not really mean to make an agreement?
|arguments=Zehmer said he was too drunk to make an agreement. He didn't really mean to sell it; it was more of a joke.
|judgment=Reversed.
|reasons="The mental assent of the parties is not a requisite for the formation of a contract."
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/lucy-v-zehmer
|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://law.justia.com/cases/virginia/supreme-court/1954/4272-1.html
|case_text_source=Justia
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pa6vEi3JgyY
|case_text_source=YaleCourses
}}
}}
}}
'''Facts''': Zhemer owned a farm that Lucy wanted to buy, and had tried to buy for several years. One night when Zhemer was drunk, Lucy and he were arguing about if Lucy could afford to buy the farm for $50,000. Lucy said, "I bet you wouldn't take $50,000 for that place." Zhemer responded, "Yes I would too; you wouldn't give fifty." An agreement was made and written up on the spot that the farm would be sold to Lucy for $50,000. Zhemer and his wife signed it along with Lucy.
'''Issue''': Is the agreement an enforceable contract, even if one party did not really mean to make an agreement?
'''Arguments''': Zhemer said he was too drunk to make an agreement. He didn't really mean to sell it; it was more of a joke.
'''Holding''': The contract is enforceable
'''Reasons''': "The mental assent of the parties is not a requisite for the formation of a contract."
'''Judgment''': Reversed.

Revision as of 19:26, July 1, 2023

Lucy v. Zehmer
Court Virginia Supreme Court
Citation 196 Va. 493 (1954)
Date decided November 22, 1954

Facts

Zehmer owned a large farm in Virginia that Lucy wanted to buy, and he had tried to buy for several years.

One night when Zehmer was drunk, Lucy and he were arguing about if Lucy could afford to buy the farm for $50,000. Lucy said, "I bet you wouldn't take $50,000 for that place." Zehmer responded, "Yes I would too; you wouldn't give fifty." An agreement was made and written up on the spot that the farm would be sold to Lucy for $50,000. Zehmer and his wife signed it along with Lucy.

Issues

Is the agreement an enforceable contract, even if one party did not really mean to make an agreement?

Arguments

Zehmer said he was too drunk to make an agreement. He didn't really mean to sell it; it was more of a joke.

Judgment

Reversed.

Reasons

"The mental assent of the parties is not a requisite for the formation of a contract."

Resources