Editing Lanny A. Breuer

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Lawyer
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2013}}
| last_name    =Breuer
{{Infobox officeholder
| image       =[[Image:Lanny A Breuer.jpg]]
|name        = Lanny Breuer
| firm        = Covington & Burling
|image       = Breuer Official Portrait.jpg
| alma_mater   =Columbia Law School
|office      = [[United States Department of Justice Criminal Division|United States Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division]]
| website      = https://www.cov.com/en/professionals/b/lanny-breuer
|president  = [[Barack Obama]]
|term_start  = April 20, 2009
|term_end    = March 1, 2013
|predecessor = [[Alice S. Fisher|Alice Fisher]]
|successor   = [[Mythili Raman]] (acting)
|birth_name  = Lanny Arthur Breuer
|birth_date  = {{birth date and age|1958|8|5}}
|birth_place = {{nowrap|[[New York City]], [[New York (state)|New York]], U.S.}}
|death_date  =
|death_place =
|party      = [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]]
|spouse      = Nancy Breuer
|education  = [[Columbia University]] {{small|([[Bachelor of Arts|BA]], [[Juris Doctor|JD]])}}
}}
}}
'''Lanny Arthur Breuer''' (born August 5, 1958) is an American lawyer and was the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. On January 30, 2013, the Department of Justice announced that AAG Breuer would leave his post on March 1, 2013.
'''Lanny Arthur Breuer''' (born August 5, 1958) is an American lawyer and was the [[United States Assistant Attorney General|Assistant Attorney General]] for the [[United States Department of Justice Criminal Division|Criminal Division]] of the [[United States Department of Justice|U.S. Department of Justice]]. On January 30, 2013, the Department of Justice announced that AAG Breuer would leave his post on March 1, 2013.


==Career==
==Career==
===Early career===
===Early career===
After graduating from [[Columbia Law School]], Breuer was an assistant district attorney in Manhattan from 1985 to 1989. Asked how his mother reacted to his decision to become a junior DA after an expensive Columbia education, he recalled:
After graduating from [[Columbia Law School]], Breuer was an assistant district attorney in [[Manhattan]] from 1985 to 1989. Asked how his mother reacted to his decision to become a junior DA after an expensive Columbia education, he recalled:


<blockquote>My parents just never made any money at all. I called up my mother to break the news that her son was not going to a law firm: "Mom, you've just got to remember that Cy Vance Jr. - who, of course, is now the D.A. — he's in the D.A.'s office. And Dan Rather Jr., he's in the D.A.'s office. And Andrew Cuomo, the son of the governor, he's in the D.A.'s office." There was a long pause. And my mother said: "Them? They should go to the D.A.'s office. You? You should go to a firm."<ref>http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:glyqACPOl6sJ:mobile.nytimes.com/dealbookarticle%3FarticleId%3D554677+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>My parents just never made any money at all. I called up my mother to break the news that her son was not going to a law firm: "Mom, you've just got to remember that [[Cyrus Vance Jr.|Cy Vance Jr.]] - who, of course, is now the D.A. — he's in the D.A.'s office. And [[Dan Rather]] Jr., he's in the D.A.'s office. And [[Andrew Cuomo]], the son of the governor, he's in the D.A.'s office." There was a long pause. And my mother said: "Them? They should go to the D.A.'s office. You? You should go to a firm."<ref>http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:glyqACPOl6sJ:mobile.nytimes.com/dealbookarticle%3FarticleId%3D554677+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a</ref></blockquote>


As an assistant district attorney, he prosecuted violent crime, such as armed robbery and gang violence, white collar crime, and other offenses.
As an assistant district attorney, he prosecuted violent crime, such as armed robbery and gang violence, white collar crime, and other offenses.
Line 19: Line 31:


===White House Counsel's Office===
===White House Counsel's Office===
In 1997, Breuer joined the White House Counsel's Office as special counsel to President William Jefferson Clinton, working under counsel to the president [[Charles Ruff]]. As special counsel, Breuer defended the White House and President Clinton in the congressional and Justice Department investigations of the Clinton campaign's fundraising.  He also defended the White House and President Clinton in the various independent counsel investigations, including [[Ken Starr|Ken Starr's]] Lewinsky investigation.  During the impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, he defended the President in the impeachment hearings in the House and the impeachment trial in the Senate.
In 1997, Breuer joined the [[White House Counsel|White House Counsel's Office]] as special counsel to [[Bill Clinton|President William Jefferson Clinton]], working under counsel to the president [[Charles Ruff|Charles F.C. Ruff]]. As special counsel, Breuer defended the White House and President Clinton in the [[1996 United States campaign finance controversy|congressional and Justice Department investigations]] of the Clinton campaign's fundraising.  He also defended the White House and President Clinton in the various [[United States Office of the Independent Counsel|independent counsel]] investigations, including [[Ken Starr|Ken Starr's]] [[Lewinsky scandal|Lewinsky investigation]].  During the [[Impeachment of Bill Clinton|impeachment proceedings against President Clinton]], he defended the President in the impeachment hearings in the House and the impeachment trial in the Senate.


===Private practice===
===Private practice===
Prior to becoming assistant attorney general, Breuer was a partner in the Washington law firm of [[Covington & Burling|Covington & Burling LLP]] and the co-chairman of its white-collar defense and investigations practice group. Breuer was best known for his work representing the subjects of congressional investigations. He represented the University of California in an investigation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Moody's Investor Service in the wake of Enron's collapse, Halliburton/KBR in a hearing conducted by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Roger Clemens,<ref>Duff Wilson, "New York Times", [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/sports/baseball/18baseball.html “Clemens Hires Top Washington Lawyer”], January 18, 2008</ref> Yahoo!, and the Special Litigation Committee of the Board of Directors of Hewlett Packard.
Prior to becoming assistant attorney general, Breuer was a partner in the Washington law firm of [[Covington & Burling|Covington & Burling LLP]] and the co-chairman of its white-collar defense and investigations practice group. Breuer was best known for his work representing the subjects of congressional investigations. He represented the University of California in an investigation of [[Los Alamos National Laboratory]], Moody's Investor Service in the wake of [[Enron|Enron's]] collapse, [[Halliburton]]/[[KBR (company)|KBR]] in a hearing conducted by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Roger Clemens,<ref>Duff Wilson, "New York Times", [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/sports/baseball/18baseball.html “Clemens Hires Top Washington Lawyer”], January 18, 2008</ref> Yahoo!, and the Special Litigation Committee of the Board of Directors of Hewlett Packard.


Breuer made headlines when a former colleague from the White House, Sandy Berger, asked for representation after an investigation disclosed Berger's theft of classified documents from the National Archives.<ref>{{cite web |last=Eisler|first= Kim |url=http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/people/capitalcomment/7081.html |title=Go-To Guy Lanny Breuer Seems a Bargain |website=washingtonian.com/ |date=April 1, 2008}}</ref>
Breuer made headlines when a former colleague from the White House, [[Sandy Berger]], asked for representation after an investigation disclosed Berger's theft of classified documents from the National Archives.<ref>{{cite web |last=Eisler|first= Kim |url=http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/people/capitalcomment/7081.html |title=Go-To Guy Lanny Breuer Seems a Bargain |website=washingtonian.com/ |date=April 1, 2008}}</ref>


==Assistant attorney general==
==Assistant attorney general==
Line 30: Line 42:


===FCPA enforcement and anti-corruption initiatives===
===FCPA enforcement and anti-corruption initiatives===
During his tenure as assistant attorney general, Breuer has substantially increased enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), bringing in billions in penalties and leading prosecutions against numerous individuals.<ref>Leslie Wayne, [https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/business/global/bribery-settlements-under-us-law-are-mostly-with-foreign-countries.html?pagewanted=all "Foreign Firms Most Affected By a U.S. Law Barring Bribes"], ''The New York Times'', September 3, 2012</ref>  His team has secured convictions against over three dozen individuals since 2009.  Among the most noteworthy corporate resolutions in the FCPA area since Breuer became AAG are those involving BAE Systems ($400 million),<ref>Christopher Drew and Nicola Clark, [https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/business/global/06bribe.html?_r=0 “BAE Settles Corruption Charges”], ''The New York Times'', February 5, 2010</ref> JGC Corporation ($218.8 million),<ref>[http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/April/11-crm-431.html “JGC Corporation Resolves Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Investigation and Agrees to Pay a $218.8 Million Criminal Penalty”], "U.S. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs", April 6, 2011</ref> Daimler AG ($185 million),<ref>Charlie Savage, [https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/business/24daimler.html?dbk “Daimler is Said to Settle Bribing Charges”], ''The New York Times'', March 23, 2010</ref> and Johnson & Johnson ($70 million).<ref>Gardiner Harris, [https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/09/business/09drug.html “Johnson & Johnson Settles Bribery Case for $70 Million in Fines”], ''The New York Times'', April 8, 2011</ref>
During his tenure as assistant attorney general, Breuer has substantially increased enforcement of the [[Foreign Corrupt Practices Act]] (FCPA), bringing in billions in penalties and leading prosecutions against numerous individuals.<ref>Leslie Wayne, [https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/business/global/bribery-settlements-under-us-law-are-mostly-with-foreign-countries.html?pagewanted=all "Foreign Firms Most Affected By a U.S. Law Barring Bribes"], ''The New York Times'', September 3, 2012</ref>  His team has secured convictions against over three dozen individuals since 2009.  Among the most noteworthy corporate resolutions in the FCPA area since Breuer became AAG are those involving BAE Systems ($400 million),<ref>Christopher Drew and Nicola Clark, [https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/business/global/06bribe.html?_r=0 “BAE Settles Corruption Charges”], ''The New York Times'', February 5, 2010</ref> JGC Corporation ($218.8 million),<ref>[http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/April/11-crm-431.html “JGC Corporation Resolves Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Investigation and Agrees to Pay a $218.8 Million Criminal Penalty”], "U.S. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs", April 6, 2011</ref> Daimler AG ($185 million),<ref>Charlie Savage, [https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/business/24daimler.html?dbk “Daimler is Said to Settle Bribing Charges”], ''The New York Times'', March 23, 2010</ref> and Johnson & Johnson ($70 million).<ref>Gardiner Harris, [https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/09/business/09drug.html “Johnson & Johnson Settles Bribery Case for $70 Million in Fines”], ''The New York Times'', April 8, 2011</ref>


On November 15, 2012, Breuer announced with the Securities and Exchange Commission the release of long-awaited guidance on the Department of Justice's and SEC's approach to FCPA enforcement.  The 120-page guide – "A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act"—was largely praised by the business and enforcement communities.<ref>Charlie Savage, [https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/15/business/justice-dept-issues-guidance-on-foreign-bribes.html “Justice Dept. Issues Guidance on Overseas Bribes”], ''The New York Times'', November 14, 2012</ref>
On November 15, 2012, Breuer announced with the Securities and Exchange Commission the release of long-awaited guidance on the Department of Justice's and SEC's approach to FCPA enforcement.  The 120-page guide – "A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act"—was largely praised by the business and enforcement communities.<ref>Charlie Savage, [https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/15/business/justice-dept-issues-guidance-on-foreign-bribes.html “Justice Dept. Issues Guidance on Overseas Bribes”], ''The New York Times'', November 14, 2012</ref>
Line 39: Line 51:
On December 19, 2012, Attorney General Holder and Breuer announced the second LIBOR resolution, this time with UBS AG and UBS Japan.  UBS Japan agreed to plead guilty to wire fraud, and UBS AG entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the government and, together with UBS Japan, agreed to pay $500 million in penalties.  This was part of an approximately $1.5 billion total resolution with U.S., British, and Swiss authorities.  In addition, two individual former UBS traders were charged by criminal complaint with manipulating LIBOR for their own ends.<ref>Mark Scott and Ben Protess, [https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/19/as-unit-pleads-guilty-ubs-pays-1-5-billion-in-fines-over-rate-rigging/ “As Unit Pleads Guilty, UBS Pays $1.5 Billion Over Rate Rigging”], ''New York Times'', December 19, 2012</ref>
On December 19, 2012, Attorney General Holder and Breuer announced the second LIBOR resolution, this time with UBS AG and UBS Japan.  UBS Japan agreed to plead guilty to wire fraud, and UBS AG entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the government and, together with UBS Japan, agreed to pay $500 million in penalties.  This was part of an approximately $1.5 billion total resolution with U.S., British, and Swiss authorities.  In addition, two individual former UBS traders were charged by criminal complaint with manipulating LIBOR for their own ends.<ref>Mark Scott and Ben Protess, [https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/19/as-unit-pleads-guilty-ubs-pays-1-5-billion-in-fines-over-rate-rigging/ “As Unit Pleads Guilty, UBS Pays $1.5 Billion Over Rate Rigging”], ''New York Times'', December 19, 2012</ref>


On December 11, 2012, Breuer announced that HSBC agreed to forfeit $1.25 billion – the largest forfeiture by a bank in U.S. history – and to pay $665 million in civil penalties for violating the Bank Secrecy Act, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and the Trading With the Enemy Act.<ref>Ben Protess and Jessica Silver-Greenberg, [https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/hsbc-said-to-near-1-9-billion-settlement-over-money-laundering/ “HSBC to Pay $1.92 Billion Settle Charges of Money Laundering”], ''New York Times'', December 10, 2012</ref> HSBC would not be criminally prosecuted for alleged terrorist financing. Commentator Glenn Greenwald noted the disparity between that decision and the extremely harsh penalties regularly doled out to powerless American Muslims accused of similar behavior.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/12/hsbc-prosecution-fine-money-laundering |title=HSBC, too big to jail, is the new poster child for US two-tiered justice system |first= Glenn|last=Greenwald |date=December 12, 2012 |newspaper=The Guardian |accessdate=December 12, 2012 |location=London}}</ref> A ''New York Times'' editorial called the decision, a "dark day for the rule of law."<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/12/opinion/hsbc-too-big-to-indict.html |title=Too Big to Indict |date=December 11, 2012 |newspaper=The New York Times |accessdate=December 12, 2012}}</ref>
On December 11, 2012, Breuer announced that [[HSBC]] agreed to forfeit $1.25 billion – the largest forfeiture by a bank in U.S. history – and to pay $665 million in civil penalties for violating the Bank Secrecy Act, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and the Trading With the Enemy Act.<ref>Ben Protess and Jessica Silver-Greenberg, [https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/hsbc-said-to-near-1-9-billion-settlement-over-money-laundering/ “HSBC to Pay $1.92 Billion Settle Charges of Money Laundering”], ''New York Times'', December 10, 2012</ref> [[HSBC]] would not be criminally prosecuted for alleged terrorist financing. Commentator [[Glenn Greenwald]] noted the disparity between that decision and the extremely harsh penalties regularly doled out to powerless American Muslims accused of similar behavior.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/12/hsbc-prosecution-fine-money-laundering |title=HSBC, too big to jail, is the new poster child for US two-tiered justice system |first= Glenn|last=Greenwald |date=December 12, 2012 |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |accessdate=December 12, 2012 |location=London}}</ref> A ''[[New York Times]]'' editorial called the decision, a "dark day for the rule of law."<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/12/opinion/hsbc-too-big-to-indict.html |title=Too Big to Indict |date=December 11, 2012 |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |accessdate=December 12, 2012}}</ref>


The department has also reached resolutions with, among others, ING Bank ($619 million),<ref>Anne Lowrey, [https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/13/business/ing-bank-to-pay-619-million-over-sanctions-violations.html “ING Bank to Pay $619 Million to Settle Inquiry Into Sanctions Violations”], ''The New York Times'', June 12, 2012</ref> Standard Chartered ($227 million),<ref>Jessica Silver-Greenberg, [https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/standard-chartered-agrees-to-settle-iran-money-transfer-claims/ “Standard Chartered Agrees to Settle Iran Money Transfer Claims”], ''The New York Times'', December 10, 2012</ref> and MoneyGram ($100 million).<ref>Elizabeth Murphy, [http://www.mainjustice.com/2012/11/09/moneygram-agrees-to-100-million-settlement-in-fraud-money-laundering-case/ “MoneyGram Agrees to $100 Million Settlement in Fraud, Money-Laundering Case”] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121218015645/http://www.mainjustice.com/2012/11/09/moneygram-agrees-to-100-million-settlement-in-fraud-money-laundering-case/ |date=December 18, 2012 }}, "Main Justice", November 9, 2012</ref>
The department has also reached resolutions with, among others, ING Bank ($619 million),<ref>Anne Lowrey, [https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/13/business/ing-bank-to-pay-619-million-over-sanctions-violations.html “ING Bank to Pay $619 Million to Settle Inquiry Into Sanctions Violations”], ''The New York Times'', June 12, 2012</ref> Standard Chartered ($227 million),<ref>Jessica Silver-Greenberg, [https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/standard-chartered-agrees-to-settle-iran-money-transfer-claims/ “Standard Chartered Agrees to Settle Iran Money Transfer Claims”], ''The New York Times'', December 10, 2012</ref> and MoneyGram ($100 million).<ref>Elizabeth Murphy, [http://www.mainjustice.com/2012/11/09/moneygram-agrees-to-100-million-settlement-in-fraud-money-laundering-case/ “MoneyGram Agrees to $100 Million Settlement in Fraud, Money-Laundering Case”] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121218015645/http://www.mainjustice.com/2012/11/09/moneygram-agrees-to-100-million-settlement-in-fraud-money-laundering-case/ |date=December 18, 2012 }}, "Main Justice", November 9, 2012</ref>
Line 46: Line 58:


===BP oil spill===
===BP oil spill===
On November 15, 2012, Attorney General Holder and Breuer announced the largest criminal resolution in history in connection with the April 20, 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion.<ref name="deepwater">{{cite press release |url=http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/November/12-ag-1369.html |title=BP Exploration and Production Inc. Agrees to Plead Guilty to Felony Manslaughter, Environmental Crimes and Obstruction of Congress Surrounding Deepwater Horizon Incident |publisher=U.S. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs |date=November 15, 2012 |accessdate=March 18, 2016}}</ref>  As part of the resolution, BP agreed to plead guilty to 11 felony manslaughter charges, environmental crimes, and obstruction of Congress, and to pay $4 billion in criminal fines and penalties.  In addition to resolving charges against the corporation, the two highest-ranking supervisors on board the Deepwater Horizon were charged with manslaughter, and a former BP executive was charged with obstruction of Congress and making false statements.
On November 15, 2012, Attorney General Holder and Breuer announced the largest criminal resolution in history in connection with the April 20, 2010 [[Deepwater Horizon explosion|Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion]].<ref name="deepwater">{{cite press release |url=http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/November/12-ag-1369.html |title=BP Exploration and Production Inc. Agrees to Plead Guilty to Felony Manslaughter, Environmental Crimes and Obstruction of Congress Surrounding Deepwater Horizon Incident |publisher=U.S. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs |date=November 15, 2012 |accessdate=March 18, 2016}}</ref>  As part of the resolution, BP agreed to plead guilty to 11 felony manslaughter charges, environmental crimes, and obstruction of Congress, and to pay $4 billion in criminal fines and penalties.  In addition to resolving charges against the corporation, the two highest-ranking supervisors on board the Deepwater Horizon were charged with manslaughter, and a former BP executive was charged with obstruction of Congress and making false statements.


===Organized and violent crime and cooperation with Mexico===
===Organized and violent crime and cooperation with Mexico===
Line 54: Line 66:


===Fast and Furious===
===Fast and Furious===
In December 2011, Senator Chuck Grassley called for Breuer's resignation due to his involvement with Operation Fast and Furious.<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/grassley-calls-for-resignation-of-justice-dept-official-over-guns-operation/2011/12/07/gIQA3YtRdO_story.html |title=Grassley calls for resignation of Justice Dept. official over guns operation – ''The Washington Post'' |first= |last= |work=The Washington Post |date=December 7, 2011 |publisher=Washington Post Company |location=Washington DC |issn=0190-8286 |accessdate=January 12, 2012}}</ref> In October 2011, Breuer stated that he regretted having not done more to raise concerns at the U.S. Justice Department.<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203707504577010361806722038 |title=Justice Official Regrets Gun Sting - WSJ.com |first= Evan |last=Perez |work=The Wall Street Journal |date=November 1, 2011 |publisher=Dow Jones |location=New York, NY|New York |issn=0099-9660 |accessdate=January 12, 2012}}</ref>
In December 2011, Senator [[Chuck Grassley]] called for Breuer's resignation due to his involvement with [[Operation Fast and Furious]].<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/grassley-calls-for-resignation-of-justice-dept-official-over-guns-operation/2011/12/07/gIQA3YtRdO_story.html |title=Grassley calls for resignation of Justice Dept. official over guns operation – ''The Washington Post'' |first= |last= |work=[[The Washington Post]] |date=December 7, 2011 |publisher=[[Washington Post Company|WPC]] |location=[[Washington, DC|Washington DC]] |issn=0190-8286 |accessdate=January 12, 2012}}</ref> In October 2011, Breuer stated that he regretted having not done more to raise concerns at the U.S. Justice Department.<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203707504577010361806722038 |title=Justice Official Regrets Gun Sting - WSJ.com |first= Evan |last=Perez |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |date=November 1, 2011 |publisher=[[Dow Jones & Company|Dow Jones]] |location=[[New York, NY|New York]] |issn=0099-9660 |accessdate=January 12, 2012}}</ref>


In September 2012, the Justice Department's Office of Inspector General released a comprehensive report examining Operation Fast and Furious and related matters.<ref>U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General, [http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/2012/s1209.pdf "A Review of ATF's Operation Fast and Furious and Related Matters"], September 2012</ref>  The report exonerated Breuer with respect to the operation, concluding that he did not authorize any of the investigative activities in Operation Fast and Furious, including the wiretap applications, and was unaware in 2009 or 2010 that ATF agents in Operation Fast and Furious were failing to interdict firearms.<ref>Id. at 454–455</ref> Grassley stated that the report was wrong, citing evidence that Breuer was fully aware of the operation and had lied to Congress during his testimony.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/Article.cfm?customel_dataPageID_1502=42580 |title=Grassley Gives Floor Speech on Operation Fast and Furious and the Long-Awaited Inspector General's Report |date=September 21, 2012 |accessdate=February 27, 2013}}</ref>
In September 2012, the Justice Department's Office of Inspector General released a comprehensive report examining Operation Fast and Furious and related matters.<ref>U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General, [http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/2012/s1209.pdf "A Review of ATF's Operation Fast and Furious and Related Matters"], September 2012</ref>  The report exonerated Breuer with respect to the operation, concluding that he did not authorize any of the investigative activities in Operation Fast and Furious, including the wiretap applications, and was unaware in 2009 or 2010 that ATF agents in Operation Fast and Furious were failing to interdict firearms.<ref>Id. at 454–455</ref> Grassley stated that the report was wrong, citing evidence that Breuer was fully aware of the operation and had lied to Congress during his testimony.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/Article.cfm?customel_dataPageID_1502=42580 |title=Grassley Gives Floor Speech on Operation Fast and Furious and the Long-Awaited Inspector General's Report |date=September 21, 2012 |accessdate=February 27, 2013}}</ref>


===Additional items===
===Additional items===
Breuer was in this position during the prosecution of Thomas Andrews Drake, an NSA whistleblower indicted in 2010 under the Espionage Act of 1917 for "retaining national defense information", which led investigative reporter Jane Mayer to write, "Because reporters often retain unauthorized defense documents, Drake's conviction would establish a legal precedent making it possible to prosecute journalists as spies."<ref name=mayer2011/>
Breuer was in this position during the prosecution of [[Thomas Andrews Drake]], an NSA whistleblower indicted in 2010 under the [[Espionage Act of 1917]] for "retaining national defense information", which led investigative reporter [[Jane Mayer]] to write, "Because reporters often retain unauthorized defense documents, Drake's conviction would establish a legal precedent making it possible to prosecute journalists as spies."<ref name=mayer2011/>


===Criticism===
===Criticism===
Breuer was criticized by many for failing to pursue criminal cases against major financial institutions, like UBS and HSBC.  Author Matt Taibbi, in his book, ''The Divide'', argued that Breuer was "risk averse" and that he and Attorney General Eric Holder were overly concerned about the "collateral damage in the form of bad press and political fallout" should they lose a criminal prosecution and thus pushed for cash settlements over proper criminal procedure.<ref>{{Citation
Breuer was criticized by many for failing to pursue criminal cases against major financial institutions, like UBS and HSBC.  Author [[Matt Taibbi]], in his book, ''[[The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap|The Divide]]'', argued that Breuer was "risk averse" and that he and [[United States Attorney General|Attorney General]] [[Eric Holder]] were overly concerned about the "collateral damage in the form of bad press and political fallout" should they lose a criminal prosecution and thus pushed for cash settlements over proper criminal procedure.<ref>{{Citation
  | last = Taibbi
  | last = Taibbi
  | first = Matt
  | first = Matt
Line 98: Line 110:


==Media representation==
==Media representation==
Breuer features extensively in PBS Frontline's 'Untouchables'.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/untouchables/|title=The Untouchables|work=FRONTLINE}}</ref>
Breuer features extensively in [[PBS Frontline]]'s 'Untouchables'.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/untouchables/|title=The Untouchables|work=FRONTLINE}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 109: Line 121:
*{{C-SPAN|Lanny Breuer}}
*{{C-SPAN|Lanny Breuer}}


[[Category:Clinton Impeachment Defense Team]]
{{Authority control}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Breuer, Lanny A.}}
[[Category:United States Assistant Attorneys General for the Criminal Division]]
[[Category:Investigations and hearings of the United States Congress]]
[[Category:Lawyers from Washington, D.C.]]
[[Category:Columbia Law School alumni]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:1958 births]]
[[Category:People associated with Covington & Burling]]
Please note that all contributions to Wiki Law School are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (see Wiki Law School:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)