Lambert v. California

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 03:40, July 14, 2023 by Lost Student (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Lambert v. California
Court
Citation 355 U.S. 225 (1957)
Date decided 1957

Facts

The L.A. municipal code said that anybody convicted of a felony entered the city for a period of more than five days, or any felon that entered the city more than five times in a thirty-day period must register with the chief of police. Lambert entered the city without registering and was arrested on an unrelated charge.

Procedural History

D was found guilty of not registering. Fined $250 and placed on probation for 3 years.

Issues

Can a mistake of law defense be valid if the charge is an omission?

Holding

Yes, it can.

Judgment

Reversed.

Reasons

Lack of notice.

Resources