Kirksey v. Kirksey: Difference between revisions
Lost Student (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox Case Brief | {{Infobox Case Brief | ||
|court= | |court=Supreme Court of Alabama | ||
| | |date=1845 | ||
|subject=Contracts | |subject=Contracts | ||
|facts=The plaintiff (Mrs Kirksey) is the wife of the defendant's dead brother. Her husband had died in August 1840, leaving her with several children. | |||
The plaintiff lived on public land and would have attempted to secure that land. The defendant lived 60 or 70 miles away from plaintiff's land. The defendant wrote a letter to the plaintiff stating that she should obtain preference on the land and move to where defendant lives. Defendant stated that he would let plaintiff have land on which she could raise her family. | |||
One or 2 months after receipt of the letter, plaintiff abandoned her land and moved to defendant's land, where they were moved into comfortable houses with land to cultivate. | |||
2 years later, defendant (Mrs Kirksey's brother-in-law) moved plaintiff and her family to uncomfortable houses in the woods & after that required her to leave the land altogether. | |||
|procedural_history=Mrs. Kirksey sues her brother-in-law for breach of contract. The jury awarded her $200. (This would be about [https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=US%24200+%281845+US+dollars%29 $8,200 in 2023] US dollars.) | |||
|facts=The plaintiff is the wife of the defendant's dead brother. The plaintiff lived on public land and would have attempted to secure that land. The defendant lived 60 or 70 miles away from plaintiff's land. The defendant wrote a letter to the plaintiff stating that she should obtain preference on the land and move to where defendant lives. Defendant stated that he would let plaintiff have land on which she could raise her family. One or | |||
|procedural_history= | |||
|issues=Was the promise made by Defendant an enforceable contract? | |issues=Was the promise made by Defendant an enforceable contract? | ||
Was there sufficient consideration to allow enforcement of Mr Isaac Kirksey's promise? | |||
|holding=Yes, it was. | |holding=Yes, it was. | ||
|judgment= | |||
Mr. Kirksey's provision of a homestead to Mrs. Kirksey was a '''gratuity'''. | |||
|judgment=Reversed. | |||
|reasons=The contract did not have anything of value bargained for, but the plaintiff incurred a detriment, which could count as a condition. | |reasons=The contract did not have anything of value bargained for, but the plaintiff incurred a detriment, which could count as a condition. | ||
|rule= | |rule=[[Promissory estoppel]] could have been used to decide in favor of Mrs. Kirksey, but this rule wasn't used by the Alabama Supreme Court. | ||
| | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
| | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/kirksey-v-kirksey | ||
| | |source_type=Video summary | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |||
|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra39CBnqCgQ | |||
|case_text_source=YaleCourses | |||
}} | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 03:38, July 14, 2023
Kirksey v. Kirksey | |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | 1845 |
Facts
The plaintiff (Mrs Kirksey) is the wife of the defendant's dead brother. Her husband had died in August 1840, leaving her with several children.
The plaintiff lived on public land and would have attempted to secure that land. The defendant lived 60 or 70 miles away from plaintiff's land. The defendant wrote a letter to the plaintiff stating that she should obtain preference on the land and move to where defendant lives. Defendant stated that he would let plaintiff have land on which she could raise her family.
One or 2 months after receipt of the letter, plaintiff abandoned her land and moved to defendant's land, where they were moved into comfortable houses with land to cultivate.
2 years later, defendant (Mrs Kirksey's brother-in-law) moved plaintiff and her family to uncomfortable houses in the woods & after that required her to leave the land altogether.Procedural History
Issues
Was the promise made by Defendant an enforceable contract?
Was there sufficient consideration to allow enforcement of Mr Isaac Kirksey's promise?Holding
Yes, it was.
Mr. Kirksey's provision of a homestead to Mrs. Kirksey was a gratuity.