Editing Keeler v. Superior Court

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
''Keeler v. Superior Court'', 2 Cal. 3d 619.
'''Facts''': D met his ex-wife on a deserted mountain road. She was pregnant from another man. He attacked her by kneeing her abdomen. The baby was born still born.


'''Facts''': Defendant's ex wife was pregnant from another man. Prior to the date in question, February 23, 1969, the ex wife had detected fetal movements. On the date in question, Defendant's ex wife was driving her vehicle on a deserted mountain road Defendant was driving in the opposite direction. He blocked the road with his car and subsequently attacked her by kneeing her abdomen. The baby was born still born. Medical experts concluded that at the date in question, the fetus had a 75-96% viability (chance of survival if prematurely delivered that day).
'''Reasons''': Murder is the "unlawful killing of a human being, with malice aforethought." According to an 1850 statute, a fetus doesn't fit the definition of a human being, so he is not guilty of murder.
 
'''Issue''': Whether the fetus which defendant was accused of killing was, on February 23, 1969, a "human being" within the meaning of statute. The statute in question includes in the definition of murder the "unlawful killing of a human being."
 
'''Holding''': No, the fetus was not a human and so there was no murder committed.
 
'''Reasons''': Murder is defined in the statute as the "unlawful killing of a human being, with malice aforethought." According to an 1850 statute, a fetus doesn't fit the definition of a human being, so Defendant is not guilty of murder.
 
Links:
* http://law.justia.com/cases/california/cal3d/2/619.html
[[Category:Cases:Criminal Law]]
[[Category:Cases:Criminal Law]]
Please note that all contributions to Wiki Law School are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (see Wiki Law School:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)