 |
Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Katz v. United States: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(United States v. Jones) |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=Yes " to "") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|court=Supreme Court of the United States | |court=Supreme Court of the United States | ||
|date=December 18, 1967 | |date=December 18, 1967 | ||
|subject=Constitutional Liberties | |||
|appealed_from=9th Circuit | |appealed_from=9th Circuit | ||
| | |overturned=Olmstead v. United States | ||
|facts=Government agents attached a listening device to a public telephone booth in the 1960s. An illegal gambling suspect's conversations were recorded without his knowledge. | |facts=Government agents attached a listening device to a public telephone booth in the 1960s. An illegal gambling suspect's conversations were recorded without his knowledge. | ||
Katz was the gambler. | Katz was the gambler in Los Angeles, California. He called bookies in Boston & Miami. | ||
|issues=What is the expectation of privacy in the electronic age? The authors of the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution didn't factor in the telephone which was non-existent in the late 1700s. | |||
FBI agents knew that Katz was using payphones to place illegal bets on basketball games in violation of federal laws against inter-state gambling. | |||
|procedural_history=Katz was charged with illegal inter-state gambling. Katz was convicted in federal district court in southern California. | |||
|issues=Subject: Redefining Unreasonable Searches and Seizures | |||
What is the expectation of privacy in the electronic age? The authors of the [[4th Amendment]] to the [[US Constitution]] didn't factor in the telephone which was non-existent in the late 1700s. | |||
|holding=''Olmstead v. United States'' (1928) is overturned. There can be a "search or seizure" without a physical intrusion. | |holding=''Olmstead v. United States'' (1928) is overturned. There can be a "search or seizure" without a physical intrusion. | ||
|reasons=The 4th Amendment "protects people, not places" according to the Supreme Court. | |reasons=The 4th Amendment "protects people, not places" according to the Supreme Court. | ||
|comments=*[[United States v. Jones]] | |comments=*[[United States v. Jones]] | ||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |||
|link=https://landmarkcases.c-span.org/Case/22/Katz-v.-United-States | |||
|case_text_source=C-SPAN video discussion | |||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/katz-v-united-states | |||
|source_type=Video summary | |||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |||
|link=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1967/35 | |||
|case_text_source=Oyez | |||
}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:36, July 14, 2023
| Katz v. United States | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | December 18, 1967 |
| Appealed from | 9th Circuit |
| Overturned | Olmstead v. United States |
Facts
Government agents attached a listening device to a public telephone booth in the 1960s. An illegal gambling suspect's conversations were recorded without his knowledge.
Katz was the gambler in Los Angeles, California. He called bookies in Boston & Miami.
FBI agents knew that Katz was using payphones to place illegal bets on basketball games in violation of federal laws against inter-state gambling.Procedural History
Katz was charged with illegal inter-state gambling. Katz was convicted in federal district court in southern California.
Issues
Subject: Redefining Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
What is the expectation of privacy in the electronic age? The authors of the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution didn't factor in the telephone which was non-existent in the late 1700s.Holding
Olmstead v. United States (1928) is overturned. There can be a "search or seizure" without a physical intrusion.
Reasons
The 4th Amendment "protects people, not places" according to the Supreme Court.
