Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Katz v. United States: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
(United States v. Jones) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|holding=''Olmstead v. United States'' (1928) is overturned. There can be a "search or seizure" without a physical intrusion. | |holding=''Olmstead v. United States'' (1928) is overturned. There can be a "search or seizure" without a physical intrusion. | ||
|reasons=The 4th Amendment "protects people, not places" according to the Supreme Court. | |reasons=The 4th Amendment "protects people, not places" according to the Supreme Court. | ||
|comments=*[[United States v. Jones]] | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 17:33, October 23, 2022
Katz v. United States | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | December 18, 1967 |
Appealed from | 9th Circuit |
Facts
Government agents attached a listening device to a public telephone booth in the 1960s. An illegal gambling suspect's conversations were recorded without his knowledge.
Katz was the gambler.Issues
What is the expectation of privacy in the electronic age? The authors of the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution didn't factor in the telephone which was non-existent in the late 1700s.
Holding
Olmstead v. United States (1928) is overturned. There can be a "search or seizure" without a physical intrusion.
Reasons
The 4th Amendment "protects people, not places" according to the Supreme Court.