 |
Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Katz v. United States: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=December 18, 1967 |appealed_from=9th Circuit |case_treatment=No |facts=Government agent attached a listeni...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|appealed_from=9th Circuit | |appealed_from=9th Circuit | ||
|case_treatment=No | |case_treatment=No | ||
|facts=Government | |facts=Government agents attached a listening device to a public telephone booth in the 1960s. An illegal gambling suspect's conversations were recorded without his knowledge. | ||
Katz was the gambler. | Katz was the gambler. | ||
Revision as of 14:10, September 16, 2022
| Katz v. United States | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | December 18, 1967 |
| Appealed from | 9th Circuit |
Facts
Government agents attached a listening device to a public telephone booth in the 1960s. An illegal gambling suspect's conversations were recorded without his knowledge.
Katz was the gambler.Issues
What is the expectation of privacy in the electronic age? The authors of the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution didn't factor in the telephone which was non-existent in the late 1700s.
Holding
Olmstead v. United States (1928) is overturned. There can be a "search or seizure" without a physical intrusion.
Reasons
The 4th Amendment "protects people, not places" according to the Supreme Court.
