Editing KGM Harvesting Co. v. Fresh Network
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox Case Brief | {{Infobox Case Brief | ||
|subject=Contracts | |subject=Contracts | ||
|case_treatment=No | |||
|facts=KGM Harvesting Co. sold lettuce, under contract, in large quantities to Fresh Network. Fresh, in turn, sold the lettuce to other buyers. When the price of lettuce more than doubled, KGM made a profit by selling to other buyers and not selling to Fresh. Fresh covered by buying elsewhere, but at a loss of approx. $700,000. | |facts=KGM Harvesting Co. sold lettuce, under contract, in large quantities to Fresh Network. Fresh, in turn, sold the lettuce to other buyers. When the price of lettuce more than doubled, KGM made a profit by selling to other buyers and not selling to Fresh. Fresh covered by buying elsewhere, but at a loss of approx. $700,000. | ||
|procedural_history=Jury determined that KGM breached contract, and the buyer was entitled to $655,906.22 with interest accruing from 30 days before trial. Seller appealed. | |procedural_history=Jury determined that KGM breached contract, and the buyer was entitled to $655,906.22 with interest accruing from 30 days before trial. Seller appealed. | ||
