Johnson v. Davis: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
|date=October 31, 1985
|date=October 31, 1985
|subject=Property
|subject=Property
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Johnson (defendant) agreed to sell his house to the Davises (plaintiffs).
|facts=Johnson (defendant) agreed to sell his house to the Davises (plaintiffs).


Line 15: Line 14:
Davis wins in the trial court & the court of appeals in Florida.
Davis wins in the trial court & the court of appeals in Florida.
|issues=Does the seller of a house have a duty to disclose facts that materially affect the value of the house, are not readily observable, & are not known to the buyer?
|issues=Does the seller of a house have a duty to disclose facts that materially affect the value of the house, are not readily observable, & are not known to the buyer?
|holding=The home seller must disclose facts about the home which may not be readily observable.
|rule=Historically, court followed [https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/caveat_emptor caveat emptor] (let the buyer beware).
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://law.justia.com/cases/florida/supreme-court/1985/65330-0.html
|link=https://law.justia.com/cases/florida/supreme-court/1985/65330-0.html
Line 20: Line 21:
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/johnson-v-davis
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/johnson-v-davis
|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary
|source_type=Video summary
|case_text_source=Quimbee
}}
}}
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 03:41, July 14, 2023

Johnson v. Davis
Court Florida Supreme Court
Citation
Date decided October 31, 1985

Facts

Johnson (defendant) agreed to sell his house to the Davises (plaintiffs).

The home sales contract stipulated a $5,000 initial deposit & a $26,000 2nd deposit (in the 1980s money).

The buyers Davises had the right to inspect the roof. Before closing, the buyers noticed peeling plaster in the house.

After closing, the buyers (Davis) found the house needed a new roof for $15,000.

Procedural History

Davis sued the seller Johnson for rescission of the real estate contract.

Davis wins in the trial court & the court of appeals in Florida.

Issues

Does the seller of a house have a duty to disclose facts that materially affect the value of the house, are not readily observable, & are not known to the buyer?

Holding

The home seller must disclose facts about the home which may not be readily observable.

Rule

Historically, court followed caveat emptor (let the buyer beware).

Resources