Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Jarvis v. Gillespie: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
In 1947 - 1986, Jarvis ran a logging operation & grazed cattle on his Jarvis parcel. | In 1947 - 1986, Jarvis ran a logging operation & grazed cattle on his Jarvis parcel. | ||
In 1986, the town of Waterville conveyed the Jarvis parcel to Gillespie via a quitclaim deed. | |||
|procedural_history=Jarvis claimed legal possession of the Waterville parcel by [[adverse]] possession; Jarvis sued Gillespie when Gillespie tried to enter the parcel. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/jarvis-v-gillespie | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/jarvis-v-gillespie |
Revision as of 16:52, April 10, 2023
Jarvis v. Gillespie | |
Court | Vermont Supreme Court |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | January 18, 1991 |
Facts
Jarvis acquired about 1 acre in Waterville, Vermont in 1935. Jarvis owned lands on 3 sides of the parcel while the 4th side butted up against a road.
In 1947 - 1986, Jarvis ran a logging operation & grazed cattle on his Jarvis parcel.
In 1986, the town of Waterville conveyed the Jarvis parcel to Gillespie via a quitclaim deed.Procedural History
Jarvis claimed legal possession of the Waterville parcel by adverse possession; Jarvis sued Gillespie when Gillespie tried to enter the parcel.
Resources
- Case text at Quimbee video summary
- Case text at CaseText
- Case text at Justia
- Case text at CaseBriefs