 |
Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
McIntyre v. Nicastro: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |citation=131 S. Ct. 2780 |date=2011 |subject=Civil Procedure |partially_overturned=Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court |holding=A 6 to 3 holding; A British manufacturer couldn't be subjected to '''personal jurisdiction''' in New Jersey because the manufacturer hadn't advertised or sent goods directly to New Jersey. |rule=Touchstones of purposeful availment # deliberate targeting # intentional t...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 20:14, May 1, 2024
| McIntyre v. Nicastro | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | 131 S. Ct. 2780 |
| Date decided | 2011 |
| Partially overturned | Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court |
Holding
A 6 to 3 holding;
A British manufacturer couldn't be subjected to personal jurisdiction in New Jersey because the manufacturer hadn't advertised or sent goods directly to New Jersey.Rule
Touchstones of purposeful availment
- deliberate targeting
- intentional targeting (via advertising)
- conscious targeting
