Imbler v. Pachtman: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=March 1976 |subject=Criminal Law |case_treatment=No |facts=Pachtman (defendant) prosecuted Imbler (plainti...")
 
m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "")
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
|date=March 1976
|date=March 1976
|subject=Criminal Law
|subject=Criminal Law
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Pachtman (defendant) prosecuted Imbler (plaintiff) for murder.
|facts=Pachtman (defendant) prosecuted Imbler (plaintiff) for murder.
|procedural_history=Imbler is found guility, convicted for murder, and sentenced.
|procedural_history=Imbler is found guility, convicted for murder, and sentenced.
Line 15: Line 14:


No justice voices any dissent.
No justice voices any dissent.
|comments=*''[[Harlow v. Fitzgerald]]''
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/imbler-v-pachtman
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/imbler-v-pachtman

Latest revision as of 03:41, July 14, 2023

Imbler v. Pachtman
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided March 1976

Facts

Pachtman (defendant) prosecuted Imbler (plaintiff) for murder.

Procedural History

Imbler is found guility, convicted for murder, and sentenced.

After several years, Pachtman (prosecutor) reveal that he had information which would have weakend his case.

Imbler is released from prison after his conviction is overturned.

Imbler civilly sues Pachtman in federal court for damages.

Holding

A prosecutor has absolute immunity--not just qualified immunity.

No justice voices any dissent.

Comments

Resources