Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Editing Hochster v De La Tour
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|arguments=De La Tour also claimed that Hochster should have remained ready & willing to enter into the contract if he was not contented to dissolve the contract. | |arguments=De La Tour also claimed that Hochster should have remained ready & willing to enter into the contract if he was not contented to dissolve the contract. | ||
|holding=Yes. If a party to a contract informs the other party of an intent to breach, the first party may file suit immediately. | |holding=Yes. If a party to a contract informs the other party of an intent to breach, the first party may file suit immediately. | ||
|judgment= | |judgment=Judgment for the Hochster. | ||
|reasons=# If a party has rendered it impossible to perform his end of the contract before the day comes which he is to perform, his is instantly liable for breach. | |reasons=# If a party has rendered it impossible to perform his end of the contract before the day comes which he is to perform, his is instantly liable for breach. | ||
# It is reasonable after the renunciation of an agreement by the other party to consider yourself resolved from any future performance of it, thus retaining the right to sue for damages suffered by the breach. | # It is reasonable after the renunciation of an agreement by the other party to consider yourself resolved from any future performance of it, thus retaining the right to sue for damages suffered by the breach. |