Griswold v. Connecticut: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/381/479/ | |link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/381/479/ | ||
|case_text_source=Justia | |case_text_source=Justia | ||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |||
|link=https://landmarkcases.c-span.org/Case/21/Griswold-v.-Connecticut | |||
|case_text_source=C-SPAN video discussion | |||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/griswold-v-connecticut | |||
|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary | |||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 12:17, June 4, 2023
Griswold v. Connecticut | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | June 7, 1965 |
Followed by | |
Eisenstadt v. Baird |
Holding
Connecticut's law banning the distribution of contraceptives is an unconstitutional burden on the "right of marital privacy."
Reasons
William O. Douglas: "The foregoing cases suggest that specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance."
Arthur Goldberg saw the Connecticut law as a violation of the 9th Amendment.