Good News Club v. Milford Central School: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary" to "|source_type=Video summary |case_text_source=Quimbee")
Line 18: Line 18:
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/good-news-club-v-milford-central-school
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/good-news-club-v-milford-central-school
|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary
|source_type=Video summary
|case_text_source=Quimbee
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/533/98/
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/533/98/

Revision as of 02:41, July 14, 2023

Good News Club v. Milford Central School
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided June 11, 2001
Appealed from 2nd Circuit

Facts

Milford Central School ("Milford") allowed district residents to use its building after school hours for specific purposes. Milford expressly prohibited use for religious purposes.

Good News Club ("Good") was a private Protestant Christian organization for children.

Good applied to use Milford for prayers, indoctrination, and its other Christian activities. Milford turned down Good's request.

Procedural History

Good sued Milford in the federal district court in northern New York for violation of Good's right to free speech under the 1st Amendment.

Milford wins at the district court and 2nd Circuit.

Issues

Can religious instructions be excluded from a limited public forum?

Arguments

Milford argued that its exclusion of after-school religious training was to avoid an Establishment Clause violation.

Holding

Milford may not exclude religious speech from its limited public forum.

Resources