Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Auth.: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court= |citation=469 U.S. 528 (1985) |date=1985 |subject=Constitutional Law |appealed_from= |case_treatment=Yes |overturned=National League of Cites v. U...")
 
m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=Yes " to "")
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
|subject=Constitutional Law
|subject=Constitutional Law
|appealed_from=
|appealed_from=
|case_treatment=Yes
|overturned=National League of Cities v. Usery
|overturned=National League of Cites v. Usery
|facts=
|facts=
|procedural_history=
|procedural_history=
|issues=Whether it is possible for the court to determine if a particular government function is integral and whether this test is faithful to the roles of federalism.
|issues=Whether it is possible for the court to determine if a particular government function is integral and whether this test is faithful to the roles of federalism.
|arguments=
|arguments=
|holding=[[National League of Cites v. Usery]] overruled.
|holding=[[National League of Cities v. Usery]] overruled.
|judgment=
|judgment=
|reasons=
|reasons=

Latest revision as of 03:36, July 14, 2023

Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Auth.
Court
Citation 469 U.S. 528 (1985)
Date decided 1985
Overturned National League of Cities v. Usery

Issues

Whether it is possible for the court to determine if a particular government function is integral and whether this test is faithful to the roles of federalism.

Holding

Rule

The court rejects as unsound in principle and unworkable in practice a rule of state immunity from federal regulation that turns on a judicial appraisal of whether a particular governmental function is “integral” or “traditional”.