Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Garcetti v. Ceballos: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|subject=First Amendment | |subject=First Amendment | ||
|case_treatment=No | |case_treatment=No | ||
|facts=Ceballos was a Los Angeles deputy DA (district attorney). | |facts=Ceballos was a Los Angeles deputy DA (district attorney). He learned that an affidavit for a search warrant contained inaccuracies. Next, he wrote a memo recommending dismissal of the case. | ||
|rule=A '''public employee''' doesn't sacrifice freedom of expression as a condition of employment. Nonetheless, freedom of expression may be limited for expressions made in the course of the aforesaid employment. | |rule=A '''public employee''' doesn't sacrifice freedom of expression as a condition of employment. Nonetheless, freedom of expression may be limited for expressions made in the course of the aforesaid employment. | ||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |
Revision as of 16:34, January 9, 2023
Garcetti v. Ceballos | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | May 30, 2006 |
Facts
Ceballos was a Los Angeles deputy DA (district attorney). He learned that an affidavit for a search warrant contained inaccuracies. Next, he wrote a memo recommending dismissal of the case.
Rule
A public employee doesn't sacrifice freedom of expression as a condition of employment. Nonetheless, freedom of expression may be limited for expressions made in the course of the aforesaid employment.