Garcetti v. Ceballos: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|subject=First Amendment
|subject=First Amendment
|case_treatment=No
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Ceballos was a Los Angeles deputy DA (district attorney).
|facts=Ceballos was a Los Angeles deputy DA (district attorney). He learned that an affidavit for a search warrant contained inaccuracies. Next, he wrote a memo recommending dismissal of the case.
|rule=A '''public employee''' doesn't sacrifice freedom of expression as a condition of employment. Nonetheless, freedom of expression may be limited for expressions made in the course of the aforesaid employment.
|rule=A '''public employee''' doesn't sacrifice freedom of expression as a condition of employment. Nonetheless, freedom of expression may be limited for expressions made in the course of the aforesaid employment.
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link

Revision as of 16:34, January 9, 2023

Garcetti v. Ceballos
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided May 30, 2006

Facts

Ceballos was a Los Angeles deputy DA (district attorney). He learned that an affidavit for a search warrant contained inaccuracies. Next, he wrote a memo recommending dismissal of the case.

Rule

A public employee doesn't sacrifice freedom of expression as a condition of employment. Nonetheless, freedom of expression may be limited for expressions made in the course of the aforesaid employment.

Resources