Garcetti v. Ceballos: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=May 30, 2006 |subject=First Amendment |case_treatment=No |rule=A '''public employee''' doesn't sacrifice f...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|subject=First Amendment | |subject=First Amendment | ||
|case_treatment=No | |case_treatment=No | ||
|facts=Ceballos was a Los Angeles deputy DA (district attorney). | |||
|rule=A '''public employee''' doesn't sacrifice freedom of expression as a condition of employment. Nonetheless, freedom of expression may be limited for expressions made in the course of the aforesaid employment. | |rule=A '''public employee''' doesn't sacrifice freedom of expression as a condition of employment. Nonetheless, freedom of expression may be limited for expressions made in the course of the aforesaid employment. | ||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
Revision as of 16:32, January 9, 2023
| Garcetti v. Ceballos | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | May 30, 2006 |
Facts
Ceballos was a Los Angeles deputy DA (district attorney).
Rule
A public employee doesn't sacrifice freedom of expression as a condition of employment. Nonetheless, freedom of expression may be limited for expressions made in the course of the aforesaid employment.
