Furman v. Georgia: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
Furman was the 2nd defendant with a mental illness; he only had a 6th-grade education. In 1967, Furman had been drinking in Savannah, Georgia. He decided to rob a house while on parole. He shot through a closed door in a robbery; the bullet killed a home resident.
Furman was the 2nd defendant with a mental illness; he only had a 6th-grade education. In 1967, Furman had been drinking in Savannah, Georgia. He decided to rob a house while on parole. He shot through a closed door in a robbery; the bullet killed a home resident.
|procedural_history=All 3 men were criminally convicted in state courts in Georgia.
|procedural_history=All 3 men were criminally convicted in state courts in Georgia.
Furman is convicted under the <span style="background:magenta">felony murder rule</span>.
|issues=Is the death penalty [[Constitution of the United States|constitutional]]?
|issues=Is the death penalty [[Constitution of the United States|constitutional]]?



Revision as of 19:17, March 1, 2023

Furman v. Georgia
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided June 29, 1972
Appealed from Supreme Court of Georgia
Followed by
Gregg v. Georgia

Facts

3 black men were sentenced to death for crimes of rape & murder in the state of Georgia. Furman v. Georgia is the consolidation of their 3 cases.

Furman was the 2nd defendant with a mental illness; he only had a 6th-grade education. In 1967, Furman had been drinking in Savannah, Georgia. He decided to rob a house while on parole. He shot through a closed door in a robbery; the bullet killed a home resident.

Procedural History

All 3 men were criminally convicted in state courts in Georgia.

Furman is convicted under the felony murder rule.

Issues

Is the death penalty constitutional?

Is the death penalty prohibited under the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the 8th Amendment in all cases?

Holding

The death sentences imposed on Jackson, Furman, and Branch (the 3 defendants) are unconstitutional. In these 3 particular cases, the death sentences are cruel & unusual punishment.

Comments

Only the 2 justices Marshall & Brennan argued that the death penalty was unconstitutional in all cases.

  • Chief Justice Warren Burger & 3 other justices dissented in this 5-4 decision.

Resources