Freund v. Washington Square Press, Inc.

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Facts: Defendant agreed to publish a book, and Plaintiff would receive a percentage of profits. Defendant later merged with another publisher and refused to publish Plaintiff's book.

Issue: What damages may Plaintiff receive?

Holding: For Plaintiff, but only nominal damages.

Rule:

  • Damages must be proved with reasonably certainty -- royalties were only speculative and unascertainable
  • Specific performance denied -- we don't want to force unwilling parties to work together (as in a service contract)
  • New Business Rule : (eroding)
    • A new business has no track record (thereby introducing uncertainty), which prevents recovery of damages upon breach
    • Can calculate the damages if you have some reasonable basis of calculation (i.e. similar businesses)