Freedman v. Maryland: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
#likelihood of inciting crime.
#likelihood of inciting crime.


Ronald Freedman was a theater owner in Baltimore, Maryland in the 1960s.
Ronald Freedman was a theater owner in Baltimore, Maryland in the 1960s. Freedman was fined for not seeking permission from the state prior to exhibiting his movie.
|procedural_history=Freeman loses in Maryland court & appealed to SCOTUS.
|arguments=Freedman argued that the Maryland land was an unconstitutional '''prior restraint''' on his freedom of expression under the [[1st Amendment]]?
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/freedman-v-maryland
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/freedman-v-maryland

Revision as of 20:44, January 17, 2023

Freedman v. Maryland
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided March 1, 1965

Facts

In 1965, Maryland law required a state board of censors to review movies for

  1. obscenity
  2. moral corruption
  3. likelihood of inciting crime.
Ronald Freedman was a theater owner in Baltimore, Maryland in the 1960s. Freedman was fined for not seeking permission from the state prior to exhibiting his movie.

Procedural History

Freeman loses in Maryland court & appealed to SCOTUS.

Arguments

Freedman argued that the Maryland land was an unconstitutional prior restraint on his freedom of expression under the 1st Amendment?

Resources

Retrieved from "https://www.wikilawschool.net/w/index.php?title=Freedman_v._Maryland&oldid=44079"