Freedman v. Maryland: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
#moral corruption | #moral corruption | ||
#likelihood of inciting crime. | #likelihood of inciting crime. | ||
Ronald Freedman was a theater owner in Baltimore, Maryland in the 1960s. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/freedman-v-maryland | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/freedman-v-maryland | ||
Revision as of 20:38, January 17, 2023
| Freedman v. Maryland | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | March 1, 1965 |
Facts
In 1965, Maryland law required a state board of censors to review movies for
- obscenity
- moral corruption
- likelihood of inciting crime.
Resources
- Case text at Quimbee video summary
- Case text at Justia
- Case text at Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School
