Florida v. Riley: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=January 23, 1989 |case_treatment=No |facts=Police used a helicopter to peer into the backyard of a home. |...") |
(https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/488/445/) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|court=Supreme Court of the United States | |court=Supreme Court of the United States | ||
|date=January 23, 1989 | |date=January 23, 1989 | ||
| | |subject=Legal methods | ||
|facts=Police used a helicopter to peer into the backyard of a home. | |facts=Police used a helicopter to peer into the backyard of a home. | ||
|holding=Helicopter surveillance of a home doesn't require a search warrant. | |holding=Helicopter surveillance of a home doesn't require a search warrant. | ||
Drones are [[Constitution of the United States|constitutionally]] legal. | |||
|rule=Open-fields doctrine | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |||
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/488/445/ | |||
|case_text_source=Justia | |||
}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:40, September 2, 2023
| Florida v. Riley | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | January 23, 1989 |
Facts
Police used a helicopter to peer into the backyard of a home.
Holding
Helicopter surveillance of a home doesn't require a search warrant.
Drones are constitutionally legal.Rule
Open-fields doctrine
