FCC v. Pacifica Foundation: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|date=July 3, 1978 | |date=July 3, 1978 | ||
|subject=First Amendment | |subject=First Amendment | ||
|holding=FCC does have the authority to restrict the public broadcast of indecent words to late-night hours. | |holding=FCC does have the authority to restrict the public broadcast of indecent words to late-night hours. | ||
|reasons=The airwaves (not paid channels) belong to the public. | |reasons=The airwaves (not paid channels) belong to the public. | ||
Latest revision as of 03:39, July 14, 2023
| FCC v. Pacifica Foundation | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | July 3, 1978 |
Holding
FCC does have the authority to restrict the public broadcast of indecent words to late-night hours.
Reasons
The airwaves (not paid channels) belong to the public.
Protection of children from harmful speech is the reason for restricting indecent speech.Comments
This is also known as the George Carlin case.
