Editing Estin v. Estin

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 4: Line 4:
|subject=Family Law
|subject=Family Law
|appealed_from=New York Court of Appeals
|appealed_from=New York Court of Appeals
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Mr. Estin (defendant) married Mrs. Estin (plaintiff) in New York in 1937.
|facts=Mr. Estin (defendant) married Mrs. Estin (plaintiff) in New York in 1937.


Line 15: Line 16:
All New York appellate courts favor the wife.
All New York appellate courts favor the wife.
|issues=Does the [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Article_4_.28States.29:_4_sections|Full Faith and Credit Clause]] prevent a state from enforcing an alimony decree after another state [Nevada] grant an ''ex parte'' divorce?
|issues=Does the [[Constitution_of_the_United_States#Article_4_.28States.29:_4_sections|Full Faith and Credit Clause]] prevent a state from enforcing an alimony decree after another state [Nevada] grant an ''ex parte'' divorce?
|holding=The Full Faith & Credit Clause doesn't prevent a state [New York] from enforcing an alimony decree after another state [Nevada] grants an ''ex parte'' [divisible] divorce.
|holding=The Full Faith & Credit Clause doesn't prevent a state [New York] from enforcing an alimony decree after another state [Nevada] grant an ''ex parte'' [divisible] divorce.
|rule=*Throughout the 1900s & so far, the state of New York has had courts that are ideal [[forum]]s for spouses seeking payments from their former spouses (husbands).
|rule=*Throughout the 1900s & so far, the state of New York has had courts that are ideal [[forum]]s for spouses seeking payments from their former spouses (husbands).


Line 30: Line 31:
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/estin-v-estin
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/estin-v-estin
|source_type=Video summary
|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary
|case_text_source=Quimbee
}}
}}
}}
}}
Please note that all contributions to Wiki Law School are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (see Wiki Law School:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)