Drennan v. Star Paving

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 14:25, July 14, 2023 by DeRien (talk | contribs) (DeRien moved page Drennan v. Star Paving Co. to Drennan v. Star Paving: shorten)

Drennan v. Star Paving
Court California Supreme Court
Citation
Date decided December 31, 1958

Facts

Defendant bid on a job for Plaintiff, which accepted Defendant's bid (it was the cheapest bid). Defendant then said that its bid was a mistake and wasn't supposed to be so low. Plaintiff was forced to seek new bids.

Issues

Can Plaintiff seek, as damages, the difference between Defendant's initial winning bid and how much Plaintiff was eventually required to pay?

Holding

Yes, Plaintiff is entitled to damages. Defendant's bid is enforceable under promissory estoppel. Defendant had reason to expect Plaintiff to rely on the bid.

Rule

You will be bound to a promise if you reasonably expect that the promise will cause the promisee to act in reliance to his detriment, and it actually does cause them to act, if enforcing the promise is necessary to avoid an injustice.

Resources

Drennan v. Star Paving Co., 51 Cal. 2d 409, 333 P.2d 757 (Cal. 1958).