Dolan v. City of Tigard: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=June 24, 1994 |subject=Property |case_treatment=No |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |l...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|subject=Property | |subject=Property | ||
|case_treatment=No | |case_treatment=No | ||
|facts=In the 1990s, the city of Tigard, Oregon, faced (1) increased traffic of motor vehicles and (2) flooding of streets because of concrete surfaces. | |||
In an effort to lessen auto traffic, the city planned bike paths and sidewalks. Next, to reduce flooding, Tigard required businesses to maintain 15% of their parcels as open space. | |||
Florence Dolan owned a store within the floodplain area of Tigard. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/dolan-v-city-of-tigard | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/dolan-v-city-of-tigard | ||
Revision as of 20:12, February 28, 2023
| Dolan v. City of Tigard | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | June 24, 1994 |
Facts
In the 1990s, the city of Tigard, Oregon, faced (1) increased traffic of motor vehicles and (2) flooding of streets because of concrete surfaces.
In an effort to lessen auto traffic, the city planned bike paths and sidewalks. Next, to reduce flooding, Tigard required businesses to maintain 15% of their parcels as open space.
Florence Dolan owned a store within the floodplain area of Tigard.
