Doe v. Reed: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|case_treatment=No | |case_treatment=No | ||
|facts=In the state of Washington, citizens can challenge laws through the process of referendums. A petition is a prerequisite for a referendum. The petition must be include the names, addresses, and signatures of 4% of the state voters to meet the threshold for a referendum. | |facts=In the state of Washington, citizens can challenge laws through the process of referendums. A petition is a prerequisite for a referendum. The petition must be include the names, addresses, and signatures of 4% of the state voters to meet the threshold for a referendum. | ||
The Secretary of State of Washington is the deciding official for the validity of a referendum. | |||
|issues=Does compelled disclosure of names and addresses of petitioners violate the '''Petition Clause''' of the [[1st Amendment]]? | |issues=Does compelled disclosure of names and addresses of petitioners violate the '''Petition Clause''' of the [[1st Amendment]]? | ||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
Revision as of 19:17, January 18, 2023
| Doe v. Reed | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | June 24, 2010 |
Facts
In the state of Washington, citizens can challenge laws through the process of referendums. A petition is a prerequisite for a referendum. The petition must be include the names, addresses, and signatures of 4% of the state voters to meet the threshold for a referendum.
The Secretary of State of Washington is the deciding official for the validity of a referendum.Issues
Does compelled disclosure of names and addresses of petitioners violate the Petition Clause of the 1st Amendment?
