Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Decided today) |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|subject=Constitutional Law | |subject=Constitutional Law | ||
|appealed_from=U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit | |appealed_from=U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit | ||
|case_treatment= | |case_treatment=Yes | ||
|overturned=Planned Parenthood v. Casey* Roe v. Wade | |||
|facts=Mississippi passed the Gestational Age Act, banning abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The Act included exceptions for medical emergencies or severe fetal abnormality, but not for cases of rape or incest. Jackson Women's Health Organization is an abortion clinic in Mississippi. The clinic sued the state, challenging the constitutionality of the Act. | |facts=Mississippi passed the Gestational Age Act, banning abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The Act included exceptions for medical emergencies or severe fetal abnormality, but not for cases of rape or incest. Jackson Women's Health Organization is an abortion clinic in Mississippi. The clinic sued the state, challenging the constitutionality of the Act. | ||
|procedural_history=The USDC for the Southern District of Mississippi enjoined the state from enforcing the Act. The State appealed. The Fifth Circuit affirmed, stating that 15 weeks is earlier than fetus viability, so such a ban is unconstitutional. | |procedural_history=The USDC for the Southern District of Mississippi enjoined the state from enforcing the Act. The State appealed. The Fifth Circuit affirmed, stating that 15 weeks is earlier than fetus viability, so such a ban is unconstitutional. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
|issues=Are all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions unconstitutional? | |issues=Are all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions unconstitutional? | ||
|holding=(From leaked opinion, not official): No. "''[[Roe v. Wade|Roe]]'' and ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey|Casey]]'' must be overruled." | |holding=(From leaked opinion, not official): No. "''[[Roe v. Wade|Roe]]'' and ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey|Casey]]'' must be overruled." | ||
Official holding on 24th June 2022:"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled." | |||
|reasons=(From leaked opinion, not official): The Constitution “does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating and prohibiting abortion.” | |reasons=(From leaked opinion, not official): The Constitution “does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating and prohibiting abortion.” | ||
|comments=On May 2, 2022, a draft of the majority opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, was leaked to the public. | |comments=On May 2, 2022, a draft of the majority opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, was leaked to the public. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 21: | ||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.newsweek.com/read-supreme-court-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wade-1716972 | |link=https://www.newsweek.com/read-supreme-court-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wade-1716972 | ||
|case_text_source=Newsweek article | |case_text_source=Newsweek article | ||
}} | |||
|Court_opinion_parts={{Court opinion part | |||
|opinion_type=majority | |||
|written_by=Alito | |||
|joined_by=Thomas*Gorsuch*Kavanaugh*Barrett | |||
}}{{Court opinion part | |||
|opinion_type=concurrence | |||
|written_by=Thomas | |||
}}{{Court opinion part | |||
|opinion_type=concurrence | |||
|written_by=Kavanaugh | |||
}}{{Court opinion part | |||
|opinion_type=concurrence | |||
|written_by=Roberts | |||
}}{{Court opinion part | |||
|opinion_type=dissent | |||
|written_by=Breyer*Sotomayor*Kagan | |||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 17:30, June 25, 2022
| Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization | |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | June 24, 2022 |
| Appealed from | U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit |
| Overturned | Planned Parenthood v. Casey Roe v. Wade |
| Case Opinions | |
| majority | written by Alito joined by Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett |
| concurrence | written by Thomas |
| concurrence | written by Kavanaugh |
| concurrence | written by Roberts |
| dissent | written by Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan |
Facts
Mississippi passed the Gestational Age Act, banning abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The Act included exceptions for medical emergencies or severe fetal abnormality, but not for cases of rape or incest. Jackson Women's Health Organization is an abortion clinic in Mississippi. The clinic sued the state, challenging the constitutionality of the Act.
Procedural History
The USDC for the Southern District of Mississippi enjoined the state from enforcing the Act. The State appealed. The Fifth Circuit affirmed, stating that 15 weeks is earlier than fetus viability, so such a ban is unconstitutional.
The State petitioned the Fifth Circuit decision to the Supreme Court.Issues
Are all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions unconstitutional?
Holding
(From leaked opinion, not official): No. "Roe and Casey must be overruled."
Official holding on 24th June 2022:"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled."Reasons
(From leaked opinion, not official): The Constitution “does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating and prohibiting abortion.”
Comments
On May 2, 2022, a draft of the majority opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, was leaked to the public.
