Editing Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Case Brief
{{Infobox Case Brief
|court=Supreme Court of the United States
|court=U.S. Supreme Court
|date=June 24, 2022
|subject=Constitutional Law
|subject=Constitutional Law
|appealed_from=U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit
|appealed_from=U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit
|overturned=Planned Parenthood v. Casey* Roe v. Wade
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Mississippi passed the Gestational Age Act, banning abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The Act included exceptions for medical emergencies or severe fetal abnormality, but not for cases of rape or incest. [https://jacksonwomenshealth.com/ Jackson Women's Health Organization] is an abortion clinic in [https://www.ms.gov/ Mississippi]. The clinic sued the state, challenging the constitutionality of the Act.
|facts=Mississippi passed the Gestational Age Act, banning abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The Act included exceptions for medical emergencies or severe fetal abnormality, but not for cases of rape or incest. Jackson Women's Health Organization is an abortion clinic in Mississippi. The clinic sued the state, challenging the constitutionality of the Act.
|procedural_history=The [https://www.mssd.uscourts.gov/content/jackson USDC for the Southern District of Mississippi] enjoined the state from enforcing the Act. The State appealed. The Fifth Circuit affirmed, stating that 15 weeks is earlier than fetus viability, so such a ban is unconstitutional.
|procedural_history=The USDC for the Southern District of Mississippi enjoined the state from enforcing the Act. The State appealed. The Fifth Circuit affirmed, stating that 15 weeks is earlier than fetus viability, so such a ban is unconstitutional.


The State petitioned the Fifth Circuit decision to the Supreme Court.
The State petitioned the Fifth Circuit decision to the Supreme Court.
|issues=Are all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions unconstitutional?
|issues=Are all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions unconstitutional?
|holding=(From leaked opinion, not official): No. "''[[Roe v. Wade|Roe]]'' and ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey|Casey]]'' must be overruled."
|holding=(From leaked opinion, not official): No. "''[[Roe v. Wade|Roe]]'' and ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey|Casey]]'' must be overruled."
Official holding on 24th June 2022:"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled."
|reasons=(From leaked opinion, not official): The Constitution “does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating and prohibiting abortion.”
|reasons=(From leaked opinion, not official): The Constitution “does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating and prohibiting abortion.”
|comments=On May 2, 2022, a draft of the majority opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, was leaked to the public.
|comments=On May 2, 2022, a draft of the majority opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, was leaked to the public.
Line 20: Line 17:
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.newsweek.com/read-supreme-court-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wade-1716972
|link=https://www.newsweek.com/read-supreme-court-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wade-1716972
|case_text_source=Newsweek article
|case_text_source=Newsweek article containing the 213-page decision
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization
|source_type=Video summary
|case_text_source=Quimbee
}}
|Court_opinion_parts={{Court opinion part
|opinion_type=majority
|written_by=Alito
|joined_by=Thomas*Gorsuch*Kavanaugh*Barrett
}}{{Court opinion part
|opinion_type=concurrence
|written_by=Thomas
}}{{Court opinion part
|opinion_type=concurrence
|written_by=Kavanaugh
}}{{Court opinion part
|opinion_type=concurrence
|written_by=Roberts
}}{{Court opinion part
|opinion_type=dissent
|written_by=Breyer*Sotomayor*Kagan
}}
}}
}}
}}
Please note that all contributions to Wiki Law School are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (see Wiki Law School:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)