District of Columbia v. Heller: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=Yes " to "") |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=June 26, 2008 | |date=June 26, 2008 | ||
|subject=Constitutional Law | |subject=Constitutional Law | ||
|overturned=Silveira v. Lockyer | |overturned=Silveira v. Lockyer | ||
|facts=District of Columbia enforced a handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock." | |facts=District of Columbia enforced a handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock." |
Latest revision as of 03:36, July 14, 2023
District of Columbia v. Heller | |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
---|---|
Citation | 554 U.S. 570 (2008) |
Date decided | June 26, 2008 |
Overturned | Silveira v. Lockyer |
Case Opinions | |
majority | written by Antonin Scalia joined by John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito, Jr. |
dissent | written by John Paul Stevens joined by David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer |
dissent | written by Stephen G. Breyer joined by John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg |
Facts
District of Columbia enforced a handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock."
Issues
Is the District of Columbia's firearms restrictions a violation of the Second Amendment?
Holding
Yes.
Rule
The Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home