Day v. Sidley & Austin

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 02:39, July 14, 2023 by Lost Student (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Day v. Sidley & Austin
Court
Citation
Date decided April 3, 1974

Facts

P belonged to D law firm as a partner, but not a member of the decision-making executive committee. P was sole chairperson of D.C. office of firm. Law firm announced a potential merger, and told all partners they would be in better or as good condition after the merger as before. All partners voted to approve merger. After approval, P found that he would lose position of sole chairman, felt humiliated, and resigned.

Issues

Did the law firm breach/owe a duty to P?

Holding

There was no breach of duty nor contract by D.