 |
Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Contracts/Statute of frauds: Difference between revisions
en>Ellsworth No edit summary |
en>Ellsworth (wlink deposition) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''statute of frauds''' refers to a requirement in many [[common law]] jurisdictions that certain kinds of transactions, typically [[contract|contractual obligations]], be [[evidence]]d by a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought, or by the party's authorized agent. The term comes from an English [[statutory law]] (29 Car. II c. 3) passed in [[1677]]. It is more properly called the '''Statute of Frauds and Perjuries'''. | The '''statute of frauds''' refers to a requirement in many [[common law]] jurisdictions that certain kinds of transactions, typically [[contract|contractual obligations]], be [[evidence]]d by a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought, or by the party's authorized agent. The term comes from an English [[statutory law]] (29 Car. II c. 3) passed in [[1677]]. It is more properly called the '''Statute of Frauds and Perjuries'''. | ||
The writing that the Statute requires is a precondition to maintaining a suit for breach of contract (or other [[obligation]]). However, the Statute is used as a [[Defense_%28legal%29|defense]], which defense is waived if the person against whom enforcement is sought fails to raise in a timely manner. Thus, the burden of showing evidence that such a writing exists only comes into play when a Statute of Frauds defense is raised by the defendant. A defendant who admits the existence of the contract in his pleadings, under oath in a deposition or affidavit, or at trial, may not use the defense. | The writing that the Statute requires is a precondition to maintaining a suit for breach of contract (or other [[obligation]]). However, the Statute is used as a [[Defense_%28legal%29|defense]], which defense is waived if the person against whom enforcement is sought fails to raise in a timely manner. Thus, the burden of showing evidence that such a writing exists only comes into play when a Statute of Frauds defense is raised by the defendant. A defendant who admits the existence of the contract in his pleadings, under oath in a [[deposition]] or affidavit, or at trial, may not use the defense. | ||
Traditionally, the statute of frauds requires a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought in the following circumstances: | Traditionally, the statute of frauds requires a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought in the following circumstances: | ||
Revision as of 09:57, April 7, 2005
The statute of frauds refers to a requirement in many common law jurisdictions that certain kinds of transactions, typically contractual obligations, be evidenced by a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought, or by the party's authorized agent. The term comes from an English statutory law (29 Car. II c. 3) passed in 1677. It is more properly called the Statute of Frauds and Perjuries.
The writing that the Statute requires is a precondition to maintaining a suit for breach of contract (or other obligation). However, the Statute is used as a defense, which defense is waived if the person against whom enforcement is sought fails to raise in a timely manner. Thus, the burden of showing evidence that such a writing exists only comes into play when a Statute of Frauds defense is raised by the defendant. A defendant who admits the existence of the contract in his pleadings, under oath in a deposition or affidavit, or at trial, may not use the defense.
Traditionally, the statute of frauds requires a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought in the following circumstances:
- Contracts in consideration of marriage
- Contracts which cannot be performed within one year
- Contracts for the sale of land
- Contracts by the executor of a will to pay a debt of the estate with his own money
- Under the Uniform Commercial Code, contracts for the sale of goods where the price exceeds $500.00
- Contracts in which one party becomes a surety (acts as guarantor) for another party's debt or other obligation.
Law students often remember these circumstances by the mnemonic "MYLEGS" (marriage, year, land, executor, goods, surety).
Uniform Commercial Code section 1-206 also sets out a "catch-all" statute of frauds for personal property not covered by any other specific law, stating that a contract for the sale of such property where the purchase price exceeds $5,000.00 is not enforceable unless memorialized by a signed writing. This section, however, is rarely invoked in litigation.
Interestingly, with respect to securities transactions, the Uniform Commercial Code (section 8-113) has abrogated the statute of frauds. The drafters of the most recent revision commented that "with the increasing use of electronic means of communication, the statute of frauds is unsuited to the realities of the securities business."
