Contracts/Statute of frauds: Revision history

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 250 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

September 26, 2023

September 12, 2023

June 26, 2023

April 14, 2020

February 28, 2020

February 12, 2020

December 12, 2019

November 21, 2019

November 20, 2019

November 12, 2019

May 21, 2019

December 22, 2018

November 17, 2018

November 2, 2018

August 11, 2018

  • curprev 14:0914:09, August 11, 2018en>Hmainsm 25,467 bytes −16 standard quote handling in WP;standard Apostrophe/quotation marks in WP; MOS general fixes undo

June 14, 2018

May 31, 2018

April 18, 2018

  • curprev 10:4410:44, April 18, 2018en>Ylok 25,313 bytes +559 Admission of the existence of a contract is a UCC exception to the Statute of Frauds, moved it. Also added more to the admission exception undo

April 13, 2018

April 12, 2018

January 31, 2018

December 15, 2017

  • curprev 03:2303:23, December 15, 2017en>Rajulbatm 20,750 bytes +262 added citation (R2K sec. 129) for insufficiency of payment of purchase price alone for conveyance of real estate to defeat SOF, where flagged as needed. undo

December 10, 2017

October 7, 2017

September 4, 2017

September 3, 2017

July 31, 2017

July 15, 2017

June 27, 2017

April 5, 2017

April 4, 2017

February 18, 2017

January 4, 2017

November 14, 2016

October 20, 2016

June 24, 2016

June 5, 2016

March 8, 2016

August 3, 2015

July 28, 2015

February 9, 2015

February 3, 2015

January 31, 2015

November 14, 2014

November 7, 2014

August 23, 2014

August 13, 2014

May 21, 2014

February 18, 2014

February 15, 2014

February 11, 2014

January 22, 2014

December 23, 2013

December 11, 2013

December 9, 2013

August 19, 2013

June 25, 2013

June 23, 2013

June 9, 2013

May 12, 2013

May 9, 2013

April 14, 2013

April 13, 2013

April 11, 2013

April 10, 2013

April 9, 2013

April 2, 2013

April 1, 2013

March 26, 2013

March 20, 2013

March 14, 2013

March 9, 2013

February 28, 2013

February 24, 2013

February 4, 2013

September 25, 2012

July 3, 2012

April 26, 2012

April 14, 2012

March 30, 2012

March 1, 2012

February 29, 2012

February 28, 2012

February 26, 2012

February 22, 2012

January 26, 2012

December 23, 2011

December 7, 2011

December 1, 2011

November 29, 2011

November 9, 2011

October 11, 2011

October 5, 2011

September 30, 2011

September 17, 2011

September 5, 2011

August 23, 2011

July 26, 2011

June 16, 2011

May 9, 2011

May 6, 2011

March 22, 2011

March 12, 2011

March 6, 2011

March 5, 2011

March 1, 2011

December 11, 2010

December 8, 2010

November 7, 2010

November 4, 2010

October 19, 2010

October 11, 2010

October 4, 2010

October 2, 2010

September 23, 2010

September 15, 2010

July 29, 2010

July 25, 2010

June 17, 2010

June 2, 2010

April 23, 2010

April 22, 2010

February 19, 2010

February 18, 2010

February 5, 2010

January 31, 2010

December 28, 2009

  • curprev 15:3015:30, December 28, 2009en>Rickythesk8rm 8,612 bytes −2 Change plural "their" to "his" to agree with "executor." "She" would be appropriate with "executrix." undo

December 20, 2009

September 27, 2009

September 24, 2009

  • curprev 11:3411:34, September 24, 2009204.181.3.2 talk 8,616 bytes +6 I've edited the introductory sentence to make clear that the entire contract need not be in writing to satisfy the statute; it requires only a written memorial of the essential terms. undo

September 23, 2009

(newest | oldest) View (newer 250 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)