Editing Contracts/Parol evidence rule
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
* Health club contracts. You enroll in a health club, and the salesperson tells you that the contract can be cancelled. You later decide you would like to cancel, but the written contract provides that it is non-cancellable. The oral promises of the salesperson are generally non-enforceable. However, the salesperson in misleading you into the terms of the contract constitutes a misrepresentation and you may seek to rescind the contract. It may also be a violation of [[Consumer protection law]], which may have its own remedies. | * Health club contracts. You enroll in a health club, and the salesperson tells you that the contract can be cancelled. You later decide you would like to cancel, but the written contract provides that it is non-cancellable. The oral promises of the salesperson are generally non-enforceable. However, the salesperson in misleading you into the terms of the contract constitutes a misrepresentation and you may seek to rescind the contract. It may also be a violation of [[Consumer protection law]], which may have its own remedies. | ||
* Auto sales agreements. You purchase a used car, and the salesperson tells you it is "good as new", but the contract provides that the sale is [[as is]]. Again, in most circumstances the written contract controls. However, this may constitute misrepresentation if it exceeds reasonably accepted "puffing" or "dealers' talk".<ref>''Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co.'', 248 F. 853, 856 (2d Cir. 1918).</ref> | * Auto sales agreements. You purchase a used car, and the salesperson tells you it is "good as new", but the contract provides that the sale is [[as is]]. Again, in most circumstances the written contract controls. However, this may constitute misrepresentation if it exceeds reasonably accepted "puffing" or "dealers' talk".<ref>''Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co.'', 248 F. 853, 856 (2d Cir. 1918).</ref> | ||
* [[Timeshare]]s. While in certain jurisdictions, and in certain circumstances, a consumer may have a right of [[ | * [[Timeshare]]s. While in certain jurisdictions, and in certain circumstances, a consumer may have a right of [[rescission]], some people attend real estate sales presentations at which they may feel pressured into immediately signing binding contracts. Evidence that the contract was entered into under duress will not be precluded by the parol evidence rule. | ||
==Specific jurisdictions== | ==Specific jurisdictions== |