 |
Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Contracts/Impossibility: Difference between revisions
en>Eastlaw m (Quick-adding category "Equitable defenses" (using HotCat)) |
en>Eastlaw (+hatnote) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unreferenced|date=September 2007}} | {{unreferenced|date=September 2007}} | ||
{{otheruses4|the excuse for non-performance of a [[contract]]|the criminal defense|Impossibility defense}} | |||
{{redirect|Impossible}} | |||
{{dablink|See [[modal logic]] for logic which discusses impossibility, [[contingency]] and [[necessity]]}} | |||
{{Contract law}} | {{Contract law}} | ||
In [[contract law]], '''impossibility''' is an excuse for the nonperformance of duties under a contract, based on a change in circumstances (or the discovery of preexisting circumstances), the nonoccurrence of which was an underlying assumption of the contract, that makes performance of the contract literally impossible. For such a defense to be raised, performance must not merely be difficult or unexpectedly costly for one party; there must be no way for it to actually be accomplished. | In [[contract law]], '''impossibility''' is an excuse for the nonperformance of duties under a contract, based on a change in circumstances (or the discovery of preexisting circumstances), the nonoccurrence of which was an underlying assumption of the contract, that makes performance of the contract literally impossible. For such a defense to be raised, performance must not merely be difficult or unexpectedly costly for one party; there must be no way for it to actually be accomplished. | ||
Revision as of 13:40, March 18, 2009
Template:Unreferenced Template:Otheruses4 Template:Redirect Template:Dablink Template:Contract law
In contract law, impossibility is an excuse for the nonperformance of duties under a contract, based on a change in circumstances (or the discovery of preexisting circumstances), the nonoccurrence of which was an underlying assumption of the contract, that makes performance of the contract literally impossible. For such a defense to be raised, performance must not merely be difficult or unexpectedly costly for one party; there must be no way for it to actually be accomplished.
For example, if Rachel contracts to pay Joey $1000 to paint her house on October 1, but the house burns to the ground before the end of September, Rachel is excused from her duty to pay Joey the $1000, and he is excused from his duty to paint her house; however, Joey may still be able to sue for the unjust enrichment of any benefit conferred on Rachel before her house burned down.
The English case that established this doctrine at common law is Taylor v. Caldwell.
Related to science
- Impossibility by John D. Barrow ©1998 ISBN 0-09-977211-6 - Investigates the limits of science and the science of limits.
