Editing Contracts/Accord and satisfaction
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{:Contracts/TOC | {{:Contracts/TOC}} | ||
'''Accord and satisfaction''' is a [[contract law]] concept about the purchase of the release from a [[debt]] obligation. It is one of the methods by which parties to a contract may terminate their agreement. The release is completed by the transfer of valuable [[consideration]] that must not be the actual performance of the obligation itself.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Duke|first1=Jeannie Paterson, Andrew Robertson, Arlen|title=Contract : cases and materials|date=2012|publisher=Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited|location=Rozelle, N.S.W.|isbn=9780455229461|edition=12th}}</ref> The accord is the agreement to discharge the obligation and the satisfaction is the legal "consideration" which binds the parties to the agreement. A valid accord does not discharge the prior contract; instead it suspends the right to enforce it in accordance with the terms of the accord contract, in which satisfaction, or performance of the contract will discharge both contracts (the original and the accord). If the creditor breaches the accord, then the debtor will be able to bring up the existence of the accord in order to enjoin any action against him. | '''Accord and satisfaction''' is a [[contract law]] concept about the purchase of the release from a [[debt]] obligation. It is one of the methods by which parties to a contract may terminate their agreement. The release is completed by the transfer of valuable [[consideration]] that must not be the actual performance of the obligation itself.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Duke|first1=Jeannie Paterson, Andrew Robertson, Arlen|title=Contract : cases and materials|date=2012|publisher=Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited|location=Rozelle, N.S.W.|isbn=9780455229461|edition=12th}}</ref> The accord is the agreement to discharge the obligation and the satisfaction is the legal "consideration" which binds the parties to the agreement. A valid accord does not discharge the prior contract; instead it suspends the right to enforce it in accordance with the terms of the accord contract, in which satisfaction, or performance of the contract will discharge both contracts (the original and the accord). If the creditor breaches the accord, then the debtor will be able to bring up the existence of the accord in order to enjoin any action against him. | ||