Editing Constitutional Law Maggs/4th ed. Outline II
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 416: | Line 416: | ||
|“You wanna fight me?” | |“You wanna fight me?” | ||
|} | |} | ||
Not writings, of age actors pretending to be underage (except, can be convicted with distribution if you represent it is real) and it does not extend to virtual simulation. | Not writings, of age actors pretending to be underage (except, can be convicted with distribution if you represent it is real) and it does not extend to virtual simulation.'''''Provocative Speech: Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942) '''''“Fighting Words” that incite others to violence are not protected by the First Amendment from governmental regulations.Jehovah Witness on the corner yelled at person calling him a racketeer and fascist. This was considered fighting words because, by their very utterance, inflict injury or intend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. | ||
'''''Provocative Speech: | |||
“Fighting Words” that incite others to violence are not protected by the First Amendment from governmental regulations.Jehovah Witness on the corner yelled at person calling him a racketeer and fascist. This was considered fighting words because, by their very utterance, inflict injury or intend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. | |||
=====Fighting Words: [[Cohen v. California]] (1971)===== | =====Fighting Words: [[Cohen v. California]] (1971)===== |