Editing Constitutional Law Maggs/4th ed. Outline II
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 254: | Line 254: | ||
====Invidious vs. Non-Invidious Regulations==== | ====Invidious vs. Non-Invidious Regulations==== | ||
<nowiki>'''''</nowiki> | <nowiki>'''''</nowiki> | ||
===== | =====Loving v. Virginia===== | ||
A state may not restrict marriages between person solely on the basis of race under the Equal Protection Clause. This is invidious segregation or segregation seeking to harm.'''''Non-Invidious Regulation or Affirmative Action or Segregation seeking to help''''' is treated the same under Strict Scrutiny (1) compelling governmental interest and (2) narrowly tailored except that the compelling governmental interest could be: | A state may not restrict marriages between person solely on the basis of race under the Equal Protection Clause. This is invidious segregation or segregation seeking to harm.'''''Non-Invidious Regulation or Affirmative Action or Segregation seeking to help''''' is treated the same under Strict Scrutiny (1) compelling governmental interest and (2) narrowly tailored except that the compelling governmental interest could be: | ||
Line 261: | Line 261: | ||
*Quotas will NEVER work. Race can never be the determining factor nor can it outweigh every other factor. The decisions surrounding this helpful process still requires discretionary measures. | *Quotas will NEVER work. Race can never be the determining factor nor can it outweigh every other factor. The decisions surrounding this helpful process still requires discretionary measures. | ||
=====Gratz v. Bollinger===== | =====Gratz v. Bollinger===== | ||