Editing Constitution of the United States

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 292: Line 292:
Only a Grand Jury can indict someone for a serious federal crime.
Only a Grand Jury can indict someone for a serious federal crime.


As of 2023, a federal grand jury is made up of 23 people—even though this number isn't specified in the US Constitution.<ref>https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-government-and-civics/us-gov-the-national-constitution-center/us-gov-the-bill-of-rights-ncc/v/the-fifth-amendment?modal=1</ref> A Grand Jury doesn't have to be unanimous for an indictment—a majority will suffice. In contrast, after the indictment, a unanimous decision is necessary for a federal criminal conviction by a '''petit jury''' in order to meet the "beyond a reasonable doubt" bar for proof.
As of 2022, a federal grand jury is made up of 23 people—even though this number isn't specified in the US Constitution.<ref>https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-government-and-civics/us-gov-the-national-constitution-center/us-gov-the-bill-of-rights-ncc/v/the-fifth-amendment?modal=1</ref> A Grand Jury doesn't have to be unanimous for an indictment—a majority will suffice. In contrast, after the indictment, a unanimous decision is necessary for a federal criminal conviction by a '''petit jury''' in order to meet the "beyond a reasonable doubt" bar for proof.


===Double jeopardy===
===Double jeopardy===
Line 320: Line 320:


''[[Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon]]'', (1922), ruled that excessive regulation of a property is tantamount to the acquisition of the aforesaid property. This is known as "regulatory takings"; <span style="background:yellow">regulatory taking</span> means that the government leaves no economically viable use for the property owner.
''[[Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon]]'', (1922), ruled that excessive regulation of a property is tantamount to the acquisition of the aforesaid property. This is known as "regulatory takings"; <span style="background:yellow">regulatory taking</span> means that the government leaves no economically viable use for the property owner.


== 6th Amendment (Criminal prosecutions) ==
== 6th Amendment (Criminal prosecutions) ==
Please note that all contributions to Wiki Law School are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (see Wiki Law School:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)