Commonwealth v. Serge

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 20:25, June 6, 2022 by Mitchman (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |subject=Evidence |case_treatment=No |facts=Serge shot his wife and then claimed self-defense. The Commonwealth was allowed to admit computer-generated a...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Commonwealth v. Serge
Court
Citation
Date decided

Facts

Serge shot his wife and then claimed self-defense. The Commonwealth was allowed to admit computer-generated animation (CGA) video of the crime scene based on forensics evidence.

Issues

Is CGA admissible evidence?

Arguments

CGA has some probative value, but may cause unfair prejudice (i.e., overly persuasive because it seems so objective/realistic, has capacity to mislead jury)

Holding

Court allowed CGA but relied on jury instructions to limit prejudice.

Comments

Ways to minimize unfair prejudice:

  • Limiting instructions
  • Redaction, using black&white photos/cropping,
  • Voir dire
  • Stipulations