Collins v. Lewis: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
m (1 revision imported)
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
| followed              =  
| followed              =  
| related              =  
| related              =  
}}
{{Court opinion part
| opinion_type          =
| written_by            =
| joined_by            =
}}
}}
'''Facts''': Parties each own 50% in partnership known as the L-C Cafeteria. Collins was to furnish all funds necessary to build and maintain cafeteria. Lewis would plan and supervise construction and manage operation of cafeteria. Collins sought to dissolve partnership
'''Facts''': Parties each own 50% in partnership known as the L-C Cafeteria. Collins was to furnish all funds necessary to build and maintain cafeteria. Lewis would plan and supervise construction and manage operation of cafeteria. Collins sought to dissolve partnership

Revision as of 05:28, September 9, 2020

Collins v. Lewis
Court
Citation
Date decided

Facts: Parties each own 50% in partnership known as the L-C Cafeteria. Collins was to furnish all funds necessary to build and maintain cafeteria. Lewis would plan and supervise construction and manage operation of cafeteria. Collins sought to dissolve partnership

Procedural History: Trial ct. ruled that the partnership would not be dissolved.

Comments: "A partner who has not fully and fairly performed the partnership agreement on his part has no standing in a court of equity to enforce any rights under the agreement."