Collins v. Lewis: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Case Brief
{{Infobox Case Brief
| court                 =  
|court=
| citation             =
|citation=
| date                  =  
|subject=Business Associations
| subject               = Business Associations
|appealed_from=
| appealed_from         =  
|overturned=
| decision_by          =  
|partially_overturned=
| joined_by            =  
|reaffirmed=
| concurrence          =  
|questioned=
| dissent              =  
|criticized=
| concur_dissent        =  
|distinguished=
| overturned            =  
|cited=
| partially_overturned  =  
|followed=
| reaffirmed            =  
|related=
| questioned            =  
|facts=Parties each own 50% in partnership known as the L-C Cafeteria. Collins was to furnish all funds necessary to build and maintain cafeteria. Lewis would plan and supervise construction and manage operation of cafeteria. Collins sought to dissolve partnership
| criticized            =  
|procedural_history=Trial ct. ruled that the partnership would not be dissolved.
| distinguished        =  
|issues=
| cited                =  
|arguments=
| followed              =  
|holding=
| related              =  
|judgment=
|reasons=
|rule=
|comments="A partner who has not fully and fairly performed the partnership agreement on his part has no standing in a court of equity to enforce any rights under the agreement."
|case_text_links=
|Court_opinion_parts=
}}
}}
'''Facts''': Parties each own 50% in partnership known as the L-C Cafeteria. Collins was to furnish all funds necessary to build and maintain cafeteria. Lewis would plan and supervise construction and manage operation of cafeteria. Collins sought to dissolve partnership
'''Procedural History''': Trial ct. ruled that the partnership would not be dissolved.
'''Comments''': "A partner who has not fully and fairly performed the partnership agreement on his part has no standing in a court of equity to enforce any rights under the agreement."

Latest revision as of 03:41, July 14, 2023

Collins v. Lewis
Court
Citation
Date decided

Facts

Parties each own 50% in partnership known as the L-C Cafeteria. Collins was to furnish all funds necessary to build and maintain cafeteria. Lewis would plan and supervise construction and manage operation of cafeteria. Collins sought to dissolve partnership

Procedural History

Trial ct. ruled that the partnership would not be dissolved.

Comments

"A partner who has not fully and fairly performed the partnership agreement on his part has no standing in a court of equity to enforce any rights under the agreement."