Clark v. West: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Lost Student (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''Facts''': Clark contracted with West. Clark would write a series of law books for West. The contract said that West would pay Clark $2 per page and if he abstains from intoxic...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Facts''': | {{Infobox Case Brief}} | ||
'''Facts''': | |||
' | Clark contracted with West. Clark would write a series of law books for West. The contract said that West would pay Clark $2 per page and if he abstains from intoxicating liquor during the time of the contract, West would pay an additional $4 per page to Clark. After the books were written, West didn't pay the additional $4 per page to Clark. West alleged that Clark didn't fulfill his part of the bargain because he drank liquor during the contract period. | ||
'''Reasons''': The consideration in the contract was the books, not the abstinence, by Clark. West waived the abstinence provision of the contract. | |||
'''Issue''': | |||
# Was the stipulation to avoid alcohol consideration for the contract, or one of its conditions which can be expressly waived? | |||
# Was the contractual stipulation that Clark abstain from liquor implicitly waived by West? | |||
# '''Holding''': The stipulation was apparently waived by West. | |||
'''Reasons''': | |||
* The consideration in the contract was the books, not the abstinence, by Clark. West waived the abstinence provision of the contract. | |||
* The words and actions of the insurer reasonably justify the conclusion that it intended to abandon the particular defense afterwards relied upon, an the waiver can never be revoked. |
Revision as of 20:27, January 31, 2020
Clark v. West | |
Court | |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided |
Facts:
Clark contracted with West. Clark would write a series of law books for West. The contract said that West would pay Clark $2 per page and if he abstains from intoxicating liquor during the time of the contract, West would pay an additional $4 per page to Clark. After the books were written, West didn't pay the additional $4 per page to Clark. West alleged that Clark didn't fulfill his part of the bargain because he drank liquor during the contract period.
Issue:
- Was the stipulation to avoid alcohol consideration for the contract, or one of its conditions which can be expressly waived?
- Was the contractual stipulation that Clark abstain from liquor implicitly waived by West?
- Holding: The stipulation was apparently waived by West.
Reasons:
- The consideration in the contract was the books, not the abstinence, by Clark. West waived the abstinence provision of the contract.
- The words and actions of the insurer reasonably justify the conclusion that it intended to abandon the particular defense afterwards relied upon, an the waiver can never be revoked.