Clark v. Jeter: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
Lost Student (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "|case_treatment=No " to "") |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|subject=Family Law | |subject=Family Law | ||
|appealed_from=Pennsylvania Supreme Court | |appealed_from=Pennsylvania Supreme Court | ||
|facts=In the 1980s, Pennsylvania had a 6-year statute of limitations for paternity actions brought on behalf of illegitimate children. | |||
|facts=In the 1980s, Pennsylvania had a 6-year statute of limitations for paternity | |||
Claims for child support or inheritance on behalf of legitimate children weren't barred by a time limitation. | Claims for child support or inheritance on behalf of legitimate children weren't barred by a time limitation. | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
|arguments=What is the mother is under 18 or 21? In other words, what if the mother doesn't understand the level of financial that she can obtain for her child born out of wedlock? | |arguments=What is the mother is under 18 or 21? In other words, what if the mother doesn't understand the level of financial that she can obtain for her child born out of wedlock? | ||
|holding=The statute of limitations for 6 years on paternity actions on behalf of illegitimate children (those born out of wedlock) violates the Equal Protection rights of illegitimate children. | |holding=The statute of limitations for 6 years on paternity actions on behalf of illegitimate children (those born out of wedlock) violates the Equal Protection rights of illegitimate children. | ||
|comments=*[[Constitutional_Law_Maggs/4th_ed._Outline_II#Clark_v._Jeter]] | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/486/456/ | |link=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/486/456/ | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/clark-v-jeter | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/clark-v-jeter | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |source_type=Video summary | ||
|case_text_source=Quimbee | |||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 03:41, July 14, 2023
Clark v. Jeter | |
Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
---|---|
Citation | |
Date decided | June 6, 1988 |
Appealed from | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Facts
In the 1980s, Pennsylvania had a 6-year statute of limitations for paternity actions brought on behalf of illegitimate children.
Claims for child support or inheritance on behalf of legitimate children weren't barred by a time limitation.
Clark is the mother of Jeter's daughters; paternity testing established that Jeter was the father of Clark's daughter with a 99% certainty.Procedural History
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal from Clark.
Issues
How should intermediate scrutiny be applied to the rights of illegitimate children under the Equal Protection clause?
Arguments
What is the mother is under 18 or 21? In other words, what if the mother doesn't understand the level of financial that she can obtain for her child born out of wedlock?
Holding
The statute of limitations for 6 years on paternity actions on behalf of illegitimate children (those born out of wedlock) violates the Equal Protection rights of illegitimate children.