Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Minnesota

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 02:35, July 2, 2011 by Lost Student (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Minnesota'', 134 U.S. 418 (1890). {{Template:Cases Stub}} '''Facts''': State established rates for the Railroads. State did n...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418 (1890).

This is a case brief stub.
You can help by adding to it.

Facts: State established rates for the Railroads. State did not provide notice nor hold hearings.

Issue: Did the State overstep the bounds of due process?

Holding: Yes, the judiciary should decide if the rates were "reasonable."

Dissent (Bradley): Practically overrules Munn v. Illinois.

Retrieved from "https://www.wikilawschool.net/w/index.php?title=Chicago,_Milwaukee_%26_St._Paul_Railway_Company_v._Minnesota&oldid=3172"