Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
|date=March 9, 1942
|date=March 9, 1942
|subject=First Amendment
|subject=First Amendment
|appealed_from=New Hampshire Supreme Court
|case_treatment=No
|case_treatment=No
|facts=Chaplinsky, a Jehovah’s Witness, distributes religious literature in a public street. He also criticizes the beliefs of others who weren't Jehovah's Witnesses.
|facts=Chaplinsky, a Jehovah’s Witness, distributes religious literature in a public street. He also criticizes the beliefs of others who weren't Jehovah's Witnesses.
Line 9: Line 10:


Chaplinsky insults City Marshal (police) in Bowering, New Hampshire.
Chaplinsky insults City Marshal (police) in Bowering, New Hampshire.
|procedural_history=Chaplinsky loses at every trial in New Hampshire including at the New Hampshire Supreme Court.
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/chaplinsky-v-new-hampshire
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/chaplinsky-v-new-hampshire

Revision as of 13:48, January 8, 2023

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided March 9, 1942
Appealed from New Hampshire Supreme Court

Facts

Chaplinsky, a Jehovah’s Witness, distributes religious literature in a public street. He also criticizes the beliefs of others who weren't Jehovah's Witnesses.

A crowd became hostile to Chaplinsky. Police direct Chaplinsky to leave the scene.

Chaplinsky insults City Marshal (police) in Bowering, New Hampshire.

Procedural History

Chaplinsky loses at every trial in New Hampshire including at the New Hampshire Supreme Court.

Resources