Brown v. Oliver

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 18:48, January 31, 2020 by Rezsue (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of Kansas |citation=123 Kan. 711, 256 P. 1008 (1927) |date=1927 |subject=Contracts }} '''Relevant Facts'''Plaintiff and defenda...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Brown v. Oliver
Court Supreme Court of Kansas
Citation 123 Kan. 711, 256 P. 1008 (1927)
Date decided 1927


Relevant FactsPlaintiff and defendant had a written agreement for the sale of land. The plaintiff claimed that they also had a separate agreement for the sale of furniture, which the defendant refutes. '''''''IssuesWhether when there is a written contract which does not address a certain disjoint issue, whether parole evidence may be admitted in this case.''''Holding/DecisionJudgment for the plaintiff.RulesParole evidence may be introduced if there is no mention of the thing in question in the contract.The true purpose of contract law is to discover the intent to the parties upon contract formation.