Editing Brandir International, Inc. v. Cascade Pacific Lumber Co.
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|appealed_from= | |appealed_from= | ||
|Court_opinion_parts= | |Court_opinion_parts= | ||
}} | |||
{{Court opinion part <!-- repeat as needed, one for each opinion --> | |||
| opinion_order = | |||
| opinion_type = <!-- "majority," "plurality," "unanimous," "concurrence," "dissent," OR "concur/dissent" --> | |||
| written_by = | |||
| joined_by = | |||
}} | }} | ||
'''Facts''': Steven Levine formed a sculptural piece from wire. That piece later inspired him to create the “Ribbon Rack,” a functional and aesthetic bike rack. He tried to copyright it, and was denied by copyright office b/c no element was capable of independent existence as art piece apart from shape of the useful article. | '''Facts''': Steven Levine formed a sculptural piece from wire. That piece later inspired him to create the “Ribbon Rack,” a functional and aesthetic bike rack. He tried to copyright it, and was denied by copyright office b/c no element was capable of independent existence as art piece apart from shape of the useful article. |